pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
No bio...
User ID: 278
Iron Maiden famously has many songs with lyrics primarily about epic moments in history, geopolitics, myth, and legend.
No, the opposite will happen. You will have larger capital investments to pay off and a snake customer base to do so, so rates will go up. Saw this happen locally - when the big factory which used a large percentage of municipal water production shut down, water rates went way up. Eventually they will downsize but until then the bonds need to be paid and a larger-than-necessary facility needs to be operated.
<tinfoil>
Anti-datacenter sentiment is being astroturfed by Elon Musk, who stands to profit via space-based AI service delivery more than he loses via increased training costs for Grok
</tinfoil>
Is that actually true? The premise does not necessarily imply the conclusion. For example even today, animal ownership is legal, but it is not legal to rape (or torture) animals.
I think 2001: A Space Odyssey is particularly interesting as an example of a movie and novel that were co-written simultaneously, so neither is directly an adaptation of the other.
It's a simple logical extension of the principle. In logical terms:
Do unto others → done unto you.
By modus ponens, harm unto others → harm unto you.
I believe in punishment for deterrence and prevention.
I believe in punishment for punishment's sake. It is a necessary component of justice and a simple extension of the golden rule: as a person harms another, so too they also shall be harmed. I find that a lot of people express a belief that punishment is a vicious necessity, to be minimized whenever and wherever possible and used only to the extent needed to serve other material ends (especially with respect to women). I don't agree with this at all, and I think it undermines the goal of justice to eliminate righteous punishment for the guilty.
This could be a mostly unconscious rationalization. E.g., the id desperately wants to kill, the superego knows it is terrible, and the ego resolves the conflict by manufacturing a convenient rationalization, which becomes fact in the conscious mind.
Or, she was never actually going to do it and seized upon that as the best self-justification for inaction. Just like all those people totally, seriously, for-real are joining the gym this week - until completely unexpectedly, something came up which made it too inconvenient.
- Prev
- Next

With Trump gone it's likely Biden would not have dropped out. The hue and cry over his debate performance would be completely overshadowed by the spectacle of such a high-profile assassination, and the debate would be considered moot. I would guess a second debate would be scheduled very late in the cycle to give the GOP time to figure out what to do, at which point Biden probably does much better since he would have recovered from his cold, and the GOP would likely be running a candidate with no experience (doubtful they get Romney to run again.) With the advantage of incumbency, and lacking the sui generis Trump, I think Biden gets the higher probability.
More options
Context Copy link