@sleepyegg's banner p

sleepyegg


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2026 April 23 11:14:19 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 4332

sleepyegg


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2026 April 23 11:14:19 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 4332

Verified Email

He only needs to steer clear of making daughter-wives and human trafficking and he should be in the clear.

I feel like this is more like a wild queen's gambit, if you were told by the referee at the start of the match your queen would be removed from the board after 20 total moves played. Might as well damage your opponent as much possible.

Got me missing the xmen movies though, might have to do a full rewatch.

It is probably a bridge in Scotland, but yes pray tell so we all know which horrible bridge to avoid.

I was the paypig about 16 years ago to the tune of $20, from some young girl canvassing donations for natural disaster relief. Got me good, wasn't prepared at all.

Because this is Israel's possible last chance to use America as a beatstick on Iran for at least a generation or two. I think Israelis call it mowing the lawn with Palestinians, this must be like getting a contractor to trim the trees. I also try to finish eating the old food in the fridge as it gets closer to the expiration date, Netanyahu's reasoning may be similar.

Democrats and younger Republicans are turning neutral to anti-Israel. Since pro-Israel US politics is increasingly associated with older Republicans, a Republican president right now is the best chance to cash in on all the AIPAC lobbying investments while there are still pro-Israel democrats in office. Now or never.

Netanyahu may have hoped for the IRGC to be fully wiped out and for Iran to be occupied by the US, but this is probably the minimum expected result. At least Israel will be relatively safer for a few years, at which point they will be stronger and possibly able to deal with Iran by themselves.

Always keep the expendable chaff on the front line to soften up the enemy before the real battle starts.

Prefer "men of wo"?

Just need to start your own fundamentalist Mormon cult to get those extra Scottish wives. Lure those missionaries in and convince them coffee and polygamy and definitely no divorce are your newest revelations. You might need to write a newer new testament, but that seems within your ability.

Either they stop bothering you permanently lest they fall into heresy, or you have yourself the beginning of a very nice life. You did say that these women approached you freely.

Unfortunately, you will definitely be the subject of a DailyMail article if you can seduce these women, but alas, that is the price of success.

"Indian man changes his name to David Joseph Smith and claims new revelation! Local community aghast, new figures reveal cults on the rise..."

Which group then? A hint?

Very nice on the Arab Joseph Smith, I chortled.

You run for senate, Botund, and I will vote for you.

What does politically white mean above? A first class citizen the law protects, but does not bind? Google is doing me no favors. I feel US blacks are politically white in some cases, depending how your define it.

America gets all the first and second round draft picks.

You sound slightly amenable to conversion, actually. If you could turn off the logical brain at-will, and saw some good incentives (a few buxom wives) I'd think you'd convert just for the big, beautiful benefits.

Talking about Jewish people? Didn't know they were overrepresented in entrepreneur areas.

Races are made up tribes based on people who have more similar genetics and skin coloring. It somewhat works for quickly understanding a few broad groups of people but has trouble with categorizing various shades of brown and brown-adjacent people. Unless brown is a race?

In your question about Indians, Arabs, and Hispanics you reveal the problem with a white/black/asian lens of race - it can't categorize most of the world with just a few categories. If you wanna go into HBD you need to read the research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatu_Vanhanen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn

2002, IQ and the Wealth of Nations - this can be your starting point. It's old, and there is much newer stuff but you can get to that later.

No surprise, kids can't vote. If we banned elderly from voting entitlements like social security would be among the first things to be cut.

Small quibble, but you probably meant Indians (South Asia). Never heard of anyone placing India in East Asia.

Weaponized hantavirus? It's probably a short list of countries that could even do it, and the blowback would be extreme if a western country ever authorized it and it was leaked. I think China already got hurt by the Coronovirus shutdowns, I doubt they would want to roll the dice on something like that again. China is already winning economically in the status quo, no need to kick the table over.

Targeting a cruise ship is a little too slapdash for countries with the means to do it.

Do you write any books by chance? I could actually hear Probasco's voice in my head (rough, upstart new money) vs Jenson's butler-like and tired voice.

Oh, yeah I know. And then I used a quantity argument to say the available quantity of women proves women are more valuable then men. Probably a crappy argument because it doesn't prove women are better than men.

Here's my "women > men" argument.

When women > men, a bit of polygyny is tolerated and population ratio quickly evens out. If the ratio is dramatically in favor of women, the remaining guys have a really good time while it lasts.

When men > women, excess males get aggressive and tend to result in internal conflict or external wars. If the ratio is dramatic enough, your society collapses because it cannot maintain population unless you kidnap women from another society.

Ergo, women > men because it never hurts to have more women, and when you are in shortage of women your society is gone. Humans probably feel this at a genetic level, we are all probably descendants of kidnapped women at some prehistoric time.

Since women > men, always prioritize womens needs, especially over the complaints a few excess males or cucked husbands.

Just call it 'test rape', and that will help paternity test bans gain traction.

I'd wager status quo continues for another 10 years unless a child somehow ends up dying from a lack of support from the not-father. Like, not-father takes a secret paternity test and stops paying child support and divorces the wife. Wife and child goes to live with the real father. Real father murder-suicides the family. People point fingers at the not-father for triggering the divorce, when the secret paternity test is discovered.

Because in 1492 Columbus and the Spanish found a more primitive people to exploit, enslave, and take their gold and silver. All those resources made their way into art and science patronage.

You should be able to tell the difference between raw and fried chicken. Raw chicken in dark meat is stringy and unchewable. You can just go to any grocery and buy a chicken thigh or drumstick and just feel it with your fingers. Cooking softens dark meat chicken considerably. In fact, while chicken is safe at 165F, cooking dark meat to 185F is preferable to make it softer.

Breast meat is a different story. Breast meat is not that stringy even when raw, it could be possibly hard to tell if you got very high quality, fresh chicken breasts and added strong seasoning. Cooking breast meat toughens it up a lot past a certain point. If you normally enjoy tender chicken breasts, it they were slightly raw you might just think they were especially tender. I prefer sous viding chicken breasts to a barely safe temp to get that raw-like tender juiciness and moisture.