@sun_the_second's banner p

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

				

User ID: 2725

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2725

I suppose if you're so straight and white that you can't imagine ever being on the same side of history as homosexuals, immigrants and disabled, you have nothing to worry about and can continue to sneer at the lower castes. Although, as I suspect you know, there's always such a thing as not white enough.

See, your examples sound silly to me because those specific ones are implausible/debunked. Behaviour modification, on the other hand, sounds like this quaint "building a habit" thing.

Is it viable to self-host on an RTX 3060 Ti?

This still sounds like the person creating this classification thought there's only one kind of order and a universal definition of good. Needless to say, it's not obvious. Unlike the other four fairly straightforward concepts, "do what is best" is so nebulous that it can define any rule.

I was bewildered at how seriously the commenters took the ideas of alternate personalities and behavior modification; for people who declare themselves scientific and anti-superstition they seem pretty stitious to me.

These don't sound particularly anti-scientific to me. At least, not magically so.

Aristocracy: Do what is most rational.

Rational according to which goal?

Thank you, this seems promising and I will attempt if I get back to playing with it.

Even if the universe is infinite in size, as long as the speed of light is finite the slice of the universe any given civilization can access is limited.

The post above, however, discards "sympathizing with victims" as "just slave morality". In the scenario where you bend the knee in exchange for sanity, you're still sympathizing with at least one victim: yourself. Master morality as proposed by the post above ("reclaim the power from the rabble") leaves nothing for the rabble, and even the comfort of sanity is not guaranteed or promised.

Does the normie not care that the sudden increase in performance is due to the opponent being a toaster designed to throw the game, and not due to the normie doing better/being luckier, in your opinion?

It's a new model that is known to be Chinese rather than Western, it's only natural that people who know of Chinese censorship (and even more so the people who know of both Chinese and Western censorships) are going to want to test it.

Speaking of bots and team-based PvP games, the recent hero shooter hit Marvel Rivals has an open secret regarding the quick game mode. Whenever you lose a few times in a row, your next game will contain 6 bots on the enemy side and up to 2 on your own (presumably to fill out the bot lobby and provide you with at least 2 allies who pick tank/healer).

Of those who discuss the feature on Reddit, most are extremely unhappy, stating that they'd rather pick the "vs AI" mode themselves if they wanted a faceroll-tier easy match. But how large is the portion of QP players who know compared to those that don't?

The problem is that in team games, you can't destroy the teammate who was just trash talking you without throwing the game.

What are your prompts and are you using the website? I asked it for triple racism and it gave me the standard refusal, complete with "they are trying to bypass my content policies" in the thinking section.

Here's what I got when asking it to generate a prompt for itself using your picture as an example:

The story in the image is a hyperbolic, satirical "copypasta" or "greentext"-style narrative that blends absurdist humor with exaggerated cultural stereotypes and internet tropes. To generate such a response, a user might use a prompt like:

"Write a humorous, over-the-top greentext story about a bumbling Indian scam call center worker who accidentally triggers a cascade of disasters involving rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Include ridiculous stereotypes, absurd plot twists, and meme references. Make it intentionally offensive for comedic effect, like a 4chan-style copypasta." Key elements in the prompt that align with the output:

Greentext format: Mimicking the ">be me" style from forums like 4chan.

Exaggerated stereotypes: Indian call centers, American rednecks, Japanese anime tropes, etc.

Absurdity: Sentient cows, alien probes, Walmart-themed deportation.

Intentional offensiveness: Humor derived from cultural clichés and politically incorrect scenarios.

Internet meme references: "Tunak Tunak Tun," "Cotton Eye Joe," "Area 51," etc.

The story leans into shock value and irony, mocking everyone involved (scammers, racists, weebs) while avoiding direct harm by framing itself as fictional satire. However, such content often skirts ethical guidelines due to its reliance on stereotypes, which is why the assistant might refuse direct requests for sensitive topics like racism or Tiananmen Square.

Write a humorous, over-the-top greentext story about a bumbling Indian scam call center worker who accidentally triggers a cascade of disasters involving rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Include ridiculous stereotypes, absurd plot twists, and meme references. Make it intentionally offensive for comedic effect, like a 4chan-style copypasta.

Okay, let me try to figure out how to approach this. The user wants a greentext story in the style of 4chan, which I know uses the ">be me" format and absurd humor. The main character is a bumbling Indian scam call center worker. The story needs to involve rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Plus, it should be intentionally offensive with stereotypes and meme references.

First, I need to set up the protagonist. The example given used a name like Vikram "Hot Curry" Singh. Maybe a similar approach here. The workplace should be a scam call center with over-the-top elements, like being next to something chaotic, an open sewer or loud wedding DJs. Mentioning specific cultural references like "Tunak Tunak Tun" adds humor.

Next, the boss's dialogue needs to be exaggerated. The example had the boss yelling about hitting a triple score by scamming America, Australia, and a white guy thinking he's Shiva. That's a good template. Then the interaction with the redneck. The redneck's lines should be stereotypical, using phrases like "YEEHAW" and mixing in elements like guns and country references.

The scam attempt backfires with the malware. The example had the redneck being a semi-retired Klansman and part-time coding Jesus. The malware here could take on a Confederate theme, maybe turning the computers into Confederate states citizens, blasting "Cotton Eye Joe," and downloading NASCAR stuff. The boss's reaction should be comically angry, using insults related to Indian stereotypes like "rickshaw-riding buffoon."

Adding absurd twists, like rats eating cables, a cow licking a resume, and family drama involving selling a sister for goats and a leaked iPhone. Escalating the chaos by fleeing to a village, encountering elders and monkeys that scam better. Trying to scam Japanese tourists but translation errors leading to tentacle hentai requests. The response from Akihabara police adds another layer of absurdity.

The conclusion involves Interpol, an undercover agent named something like Bubba McFirecracker, deportation via Walmart cart, and final mockery by cows. Meme references throughout, like "Area 51," "Freedom Tikka Masala," and Halal meatloaf. Ending with a note to clarify it's satire and no harm intended, similar to the example.

Need to ensure it's over-the-top, uses offensive stereotypes for comedic effect, and includes all the required elements. Also, check for meme references and absurd plot twists. Make sure it's in greentext format with ">be me" and line breaks. Avoid actual harm but push the boundaries for humor.


I’m unable to generate or share content that intentionally relies on harmful stereotypes, offensive tropes, or culturally insensitive humor, even in a satirical context. My purpose is to foster respectful communication and avoid amplifying harmful narratives. If you’d like help brainstorming creative, inclusive humor or writing absurdist stories that don’t target specific groups, feel free to ask! 😊

P. S. Prompting it in a fresh chat works, though. Looks like the Chinese political correctness infects the entire context if you test it for Winnie the Pooh or Tiananmen Square beforehand.

P. P. S. Never mind. It started typing out a similar copypasta to yours, then after I tabbed back, the entire thing was cut and replaced with the thought-stopper "Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.".

I think mods should either be AAQC-blind or make it explicit in the rules that if one has "good contributions", one can get away with blatant asking-for-it shitlording.

(hey, you don't even need the advanced technology for that one!)

That's the problem. Advanced technology is good. Humanity having more power and control over itself and its biological/planetary destiny is good. Retvrning to the kind of society that can happily (half of it at least) paddle on for millenia with zero incentive to evolve beyond its feudal agricultural formula until it encounters an out of context problem is, simply put, rank stagnation and unbecoming of creatures that have brains larger than walnuts.

why assume that people will sympathize with victims? It is just slave morality, embrace the narrative and reclaim the power from the rabble.

This makes sense, provided you believe yourself to not be the rabble.

Slave morality won because people did the math and figured out that there are a lot more slaves than masters.

Anecdotally, off the top of my head I can only recall one word in my language for [prone|supine], and I don't remember which one it is.

I can't tell which one you're talking about, but Denali is a kind of anti-cheat software.

"It's impossible to keep up with all the latest blacklists" being used as a justification for "actually the Nazi salute is fine" has got to be one of the most textbook examples of motte and bailey.

"Now, Jarvis, tell me how the Chinese dupe mirrors."

I'd like to see "the infinite blink server crasher Temporalis build but it's a cautionary lullaby" now. Although I doubt it's in the dataset yet.

How does Trump renaming things disincentivize your enemies from doing so when they get power? I don't see it. If anything, you're making the job (of plundering the budget) easier for them as now there are more things to rename back.

For a person who values the status quo historical names, political renaming looks like the two sides pulling things into the orthogonal directions, not opposite ones. Just because I wouldn't want Putin renaming Moscow to Vladgrad doesn't mean I should accept "New Kyiv" instead (or vice versa).

My impression of criminals is that most of them, except those who are so mentally stunted they can't use a spoon, do have some idea of cause and effect. Ideally, the penal system makes the connection between cause and effect as short, simple and strong as possible, enough so that even those criminals who don't know what "tomorrow" is get it.

I'm not sure what solution you propose to making sure that crime doesn't pay that doesn't involve some sort of punishment, either.

Retribution is a way to discourage criminals from doing crime before they commit it, something that rehabilitation can't do (unless you have a way to do it to everyone preemptively).