@sun_the_second's banner p

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

				

User ID: 2725

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2725

Except the irredentist country is not in any kind of war with Europe.

The country all but says outright that its war is with Europe and Ukraine is just a proxy. Europe doesn't appear to disagree.

this is what happens when you have diversity hires in top EU positions.

If there were less diversity hires I would expect Europe to take the funds immediately and in general be less of a pussy.

Same thing as "it didn't happen and it didn't go far enough", I guess.

What is the usual sentence for premeditated murder of someone who is not a CEO?

The social inequality is its own turn-off, I feel like. There are countries that haven't figured out civilization or outhouses, and there are countries that have figured out both (or at least the outhouses). But India's the only one with the reputation of being the country where the upper social classes simply DGAF about what the poor are doing in any way.

14-18 is when you're supposed to transition into an adult not just bodily (that happens on its own for most), but also socially and psychologically. Seems unwise to just assume "rebellion" will do all the work here. Many anecdotes of young adults either being infantile or throwing themselves in the deep end of adulthood after being stifled during formational years.

Regarding rebellion, the whole theory of teenage rebellion as commonly understood has struck me as wrong recently. Most teens aren't universally rebellious, they copy who they are around - and if they're around peers, they will copy the most charismatic and loud of those peers, hence the whole "peer pressure" thing. Parents call it rebellion but in fact it's just a transition of primary authority.

The current-gen AI that is infamous for not being accountable.

The use-case for AI at the moment are tasks that take a long time to do but can be checked quickly (such as coding tasks sufficiently covered by tests, or generating pictures of cute girls). When tasked with checking movies for bloopers, I suspect it would not do good enough to save much time.

When I consider it, I think that you wouldn't fight that often, and when you did, it wouldn't emphasize knockout blows; that while you would fall often you would naturally mind your head; that casualties of fights in wars were fewer than casualties on the march. In fact I suspect that there was no folk wisdom of head shots making men change over time because there was no career where you would intentionally put yourself in the way of many blows to the head and survive that for long enough.

(Anecdotally, Lermontov's The Song of the Merchant Kalashnikov specifically describes a formalized fistfight at the city fair. The titular merchant, his wife disgraced by the tsar's official, deliberately strikes him in the head and kills him. It can be assumed that head shots were forbidden or at least heavily discouraged - he is tried for manslaughter, as opposed to the outcome being judged an unfortunate but natural outcome of the fight).

You're totally correct! There is such a technology. Forgive my mistake.

The quintessential dude asks: Would you suck a dick for a million dollars?

As the joke goes:

Since you're the one earning much less than a million dollars, you're the one sucking dick here - I provide fellatio services.

Jokes aside, I recall recently reading that the median OnlyFans earnings are far below the wage of a blue collar working guy. Hardly soothing for him since he can't even earn an extra hundred bucks a month on the side that way the way those young women can.

And to compare this with the good old times, when was it really not the case that some prostitutes were called geishas or courtesans or favorites or royal concubines and enjoyed wealth and social standing that was even higher than Aellas of today?

I think the simple explanation is that society generally condones or at least tolerates porn “actresses” making large amounts of money because people generally understand that such women are condemning themselves to social damnation with assumptions about their reputations that may very easily turn out to be naïve and thus deserve to be at least financially well-compensated by simps whom society considers to be loser chumps anyway.

I'm not sure what is the problem here that you're positing an explanation for. Why assume that she makes that money because "society condones it"? Society doesn't decide what she makes, outside of the very broad question of sex work legality that is out of the hands of most of society anyway. A minority of rich whales decide what she makes. Society can condone it or be salty about it all they want, it's not going to stop whales from whaling.

Wouldn't it be one bit for direction? You're usually going to only have two rooks, which are either on different files (in which case just left 0 and right 1 is sufficient) or not (in which case the same 0 and 1 can be reused for top and bottom).

If you find it distasteful that a random rich naked woman on the internet got rich by manipulating attention, why do you choose to further give her attention by posting about her? I've never heard of her until this thread.

I am similarly baffled by aella-popularity hate on here. If she's so uninteresting then why do you keep hateposting about her? At least she is more famous for the texts she posts alongside her tits than her tits.

And why should I care that simp whales give her money, anyway. It's not like the alternative would be them donating it to me.

The Israel-Palestine conflict has also been inflamed more recently even than Russia-Ukraine.