@sun_the_second's banner p

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

				

User ID: 2725

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2725

You are confusing the ethnic republics which are mostly Siberian peoples with the Central Asian, largely Muslim migrants who are in every city including the core. The Russian nationalist's issue is with the latter. Pretty much no Russian nationalists ever say that Yakuts or Mari aren't Russians. In fact "only the Western Slavic core are the true Russians" is a talking point that's associated more with Ukrainian nationalists (replace "true Russians" with "true Slavs" where appropriate).

Of people. And not a territory with a particular set of borders and a flag.

As long as you're defining a nation as a group of people.

As far as I can see the post above doesn't state Iran is winning, only that USA is not winning.

I do not think a country can win a war, in general. A country can only lose a war, in the case that it ceases to exist. But there is no such thing as a country winning the war, because a country is not an entity that can experience the benefits from the war and thus have some measure of the victory.

People can win benefits in a war. Citizens can win lower prices through their country's higher geopolitical influence. MIC lobbies can win loads of money. Presidents can win reelections. This is all in the descending order of how well-distributed the benefits of a war are.

No one wins benefits simply by bombing some abstract enemy in a vacuum, except perhaps the very thin benefits of morale.

If you want to show America is winning, demonstrate the Americans that are winning - winning something.

Oops babies aside, there is a whole lot that teens can do together that doesn't result in pregnancy or hymen loss, but most definitely isn't chaste.

It's hard to imagine that teens weren't fucking around regardless. They'd just have to be discreet about it and have deniability.

That too.

I reserved sex for marriage so my choice of spouse was probably more clear-eyed than most these days.

You say so, but the other narrative is that when people didn't have sex before marriage, they just snagged whoever was available because they were horny.

Is it really morally objectionable if no one's actually gonna do anything about it, including those who could do something about it?

Cops on duty who approach a pedestrian are not normal human conversation. And by my estimate a regular reasonable 100 iq person who hasn't been schooled on cop interactions doesn't know the first thing about rights and laws around detainment.