sun_the_second
could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server
No bio...
User ID: 2725
I assume they only get one chance during the given strategically significant period of time.
For the purposes of assassination I don't care which one is the evilest. I'm not here to punish them individually for being evil, I want to do damage to the Evil Empire.
Killing a true believer and especially a sympathetic true believer seems like a great way to consolidate the Evil Empire followers around a martyr. Instead I'd say the plucky rebels should assassinate Bob, to send a message to the most apathetic, opportunist and amoral Evil Empire henchmen (which I expect to be the majority) that rather than the most loyal or the most efficient, it could be any one of them.
The apex of social status was filled by strong young successful men; it does not follow that the majority of strong young successful men, or even a significant fraction of them, were at the apex.
If it's woke to be against bad actions towards black people that are also bad when done towards anyone else, then I'm proud to be woke.
Do you see young Asian guys loitering in the hood often?
I can't think of a reason why a grown woman from upper class circles (although that's always debated w.r.t. Trump) would think that begging people to stop talking about something embarrassing could ever work.
One of those things does not seem like the other. How is slice of life the same stripping down of meaningfullness as cutting gameplay out of games, in your opinion?
I'd assume starting to vote for non-senile, non-israelophilic presidents would be simpler than repealing the first or whatever you are suggesting to do to "purge government and journalism".
Dealing with lobbying is part and parcel of being President. If he's "vulnerable" to persuasion that's not the fault of the persuader, it's a skill issue.
I do not value "myself" in the abstract sense of the word. I value myself because I experience myself, and everything I know about the mechanisms of the world tells me that I do not experience the clone.
I also do not believe you can truly value yourself in the abstract sense of the word because you (as any lifeform) had never had a chance to fully decouple the intellectual appreciation for one's existence from instinctual self-preservarion.
The thing is, from the context I suspect that it's less like the guy had checked how useless various types of recycling are and just pattern-matched aluminium with the rest of them, and more like he has a rock that says "recycling is fake lib shit".
America is actually a lot of different subcultures in a way. There's this weak idea of what we are as a national culture but it's nowhere near as strong as a national culture of somewhere like Russia. Not even close. Russians are 'extremely' nationalistic and patriotic. America isn't culturally all that unified.
It's funny how it looks like the exact opposite of what I see observing from Russia.
Russia vs. VPN saga
I haven't seen the recent events in Russia regarding the internet mentioned here at all recently. Fine, I'll do it myself. Don't expect the depth and wit of our more regular posters, though, because I'm lazy and don't want to expand my writing with AI.
Russia has been exercising in access restrictions since the middle of 2025, implementing DPI to block Russian users from accessing Instagram, Discord and a number of other platforms. Youtube had been gradually "slowed down", and truthfully I can't pinpoint the exact moment when (if) it became totally inaccessible with vanilla connections, because by the end of 2025 most Russians with basic internet literacy had probably known what "DPI bypass" was, myself and all my acquaintances included.
For the past year or so, the Russian government has been rearing its head towards messaging sovereignty. There were three main messaging and content publishing platforms in use in Russia in the middle-end of 2025. Telegram, the most infamously resistant to submitting under the aegis of Russia's security agencies, was probably the most prolific and might still be. Whatsapp, to my knowledge, was mostly used by boomers and the local equivalent of HOAs. Vkontakte or VK, the local Facebook, had been declining as a content platform. Content makers' opinions had been that the algorithms of VK are outdated and/or hostile to anything but the most soulless and optimized content management.
"That won't do", Russia said, and started cooking up its own in-house national messaging platform, MAX. (Technically pronounced Makh.)
Efforts to migrate the userbase to the shiny new government platform had been crude and had not went well. Russia must have learned what "network effect" was that year for the first time. It did not help that the new app, even setting aside the concerns of most certainly leaking everything you say to FSB's ear (unlike Telegram which merely might be doing it), has not ameliorated the concerns of leaking your credentials to Western criminals.
More recently, Russia started to flirt with whitelists, beginning with the phone internet. (Likely due to it covering more everyday users and fewer business cases.)
Fun fact: many Russian war bloggers and soldiers use Telegram for their own propaganda, donation gathering and communications. They did not like it when Russia started making actual noises towards shutting Telegram down. I had witnesses those bloggers that positioned themselves as chill, level-headed analysts always ready to prove why Russia is doing everything correctly and how it's going to be fine (for patriots, anyway) being utterly baffled by the level of block-headedness exhibited by the Ministry of Digital Communications. Some are less "baffled" and more "toeing the line of death threats to the politicians involved".
(It could have been a 4D chess plan to unite the Russian party line supporters and the Russian opposition, because I certainly had never been in more agreement with those guys.)
By the start of 2026, most Russians with basic internet literacy probably knew what VPN was, and an annual subscription to one was the best 50 bucks I ever spent. Someone must have explained what VPN was in plain Russian to the Ministry of Digital Communications, too, because they started trying to fuck with those, too. So far, the most they've accomplished was hitting the entire remote payment system with friendly fire.
Some of my friends are anxiously awaiting the advent of the Cheburnet. I'm amusedly awaiting the 2026 Duma elections. I wonder how much more shit and crud the system can dump into itself. Trump's recent escapades have been a suitable backlight.
If legal and social consequences to some actions disappeared today I would still have my own habits and conscience. If I was brought up in an environment where legal and social consequences to some actions did not exist, then I would have likely had different habits.
Two assumptions:
- there are more victim-type women than abuser-type men, and not all of them are unsalvageable
- it is in the women's interest to avoid abusers, while it is not in the abusers' interest to be nice (absent punishment)
It is a women's failure when they do not exhibit agency in situations such as this. I don't find "but what about how terrible the man is" a valuable contribution to the conversation here. It has been made clear enough that he's terrible; the question currently discussed is not how to reform such men, but how to reform such women.
For such men, we have the justice system, which unfortunately has to require someone to report wrongdoings and the wrongdoings to be provable (usually) before a punishment is issued.
If an explosion rings out in the forest with no one to hear it, does it produce refugees?
Shame on me, I haven't been ruining my life with tvtropes for nearly enough recently.
I have to say, this list has gotta be one of the textbook examples of Arson, Murder and Jaywalking.
"Be an example of a strong, non-feminine man... check... family values... check... and no matter what you do, don't let them see a nigger ball. They might just think he's actually better at something!"
To tell the truth, maybe one white supremacist called Black would be spared the law of nominative determinism. An entire dynasty of black-hating Blacks, though?
71 percentile among anglophones. Naturally, carried by technical and computer knowledge, heavily tanked by aesthetic and literary domains.
The question about
So how low a percentage of a group can be destroyed before it's no longer an attempted genocide?
Yeah, that's the problem - they don't feel the need to flaunt it, and many probably don't feel like their experiences apply to everyone. That's why I'm proposing sponsoring it. Like lifestyle influencers, but they'd be advertising pair-bonding values rather than makeup brands.
Naturally, it would have to be an exercise in philanthropy because there's no money in it.
I wonder how far can one get sponsoring successful, well-adjusted and ordinary-seeming men and women to promote their choices and the advantages of following them.
What I mean by:
- Successful - they are in a relationship that appears good for them.
- Well-adjusted - neither of them is a covert or overt cheater, and both are serious about staying together (not necessarily married or planning to seal the deal, it's not like marriage carries a lot of weight with divorce being as easy as it is)
- Ordinary-seeming - do not possess qualities that would lead the viewer to assume such life can only be achieved with outsized luck, effort, lifestyle changes. I.e. not overly rich, not met through a niche career or a heavily religious subculture, do not radiate youth pastor energy.
- Prev
- Next

Glazed raisin cakes are some of the best parts of Christian culture that I'm glad to appropriate.
More options
Context Copy link