ulyssessword
No bio...
User ID: 308
ulyssessword
17d ago
Did you calculate your base metabolic rate (or whatever the fudge factor is called in your system) so that it all worked out? If not, you got lucky that it happened to be both correct at the start and steady over time. If you have adjusted it, then that means your calculations are on target, and adjusting the inputs so that 3500 kcal = 1 lb resulted in a trendline at 3500 kcal per lb.
This study gives some people a 20% headstart on your dieting goals (admittedly they didn't measure "CI"), which is a pretty notable difference.
ulyssessword
17d ago
ulyssessword
17d ago
That's exactly what I'm talking about: It's a Calories In, Calories Out, Body Weight system and that third variable is essential.
Skimming through the paper, it appears that the difference between cold and hot is about 100 Calories per cold day, or about one pound per month. A pure CICO system couldn't explain why one person gains a few pounds every winter while an ostensibly-identical person (but fertilized in cold weather) doesn't.
ulyssessword
18d ago
A) CICO necessarily follows from the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
The naive version of CICO compares your meal plan to your gym time. The normal version compares all the food (including drinks!) you consume vs. all your planned or incidental physical activity. The true version compares the bioavailability of all the nutrients you consume vs. all of your metabolic activity, whether that's moving your muscles, thinking, growth, healing, generating heat, or anything else.
I have yet to see any diet plan that uses the true model of CICO. The closest I've seen is a single number for "base metabolism" that you back-calculate from your weight trends.
I think you're pushing a strawman, but I'm open to seeing a diet plan that uses the "true CICO" model I described. Anything less precise can't follow from raw thermodynamics.
ulyssessword
19d ago
...and therefore the scenario doesn't illustrate their point.
ulyssessword
19d ago
Scott would characterize the Developer as having lied to the contractor about having the approval, but did they?
Yes in your scenario, but it's not necessary. Try this:
Thus the Developer tells the Contractor to start pouring concrete. The building permit isn't their responsibility and the contractor is paid based on work done (not buildings constructed), so they have no reason to refuse. Worst case they get paid to tear up concrete afterwards. The contractor starts pouring.
ulyssessword
21d ago
I have two monitors here, and my alt-tab selection only shows up on my primary monitor. The taskbar does show up so you can select one application or the other regardless.Windows+arrow keys does work to reposition windows, so I'll have to remember that.
One of the more challenging parts of it was diagnosing the issue in the first place. It looked like every application simply refused to launch despite being "open".
ulyssessword
21d ago
Windows windows insanity?
A coworker brought his laptop up to the conference room, but (in hindsight, I think) it was still remotely connected to his monitor in his office. Every application opened its window on the office monitor instead of the laptop screen, so we couldn't use it for anything. We tried to change the display settings to cancel that...but the settings window opened on the other monitor as well.
We ended up restarting it.
ulyssessword
21d ago
I'm not that optimistic. It reminds me of The Simpsons:
The judges are empowered to help criminals. You thought judges were empowered to help? Empowered to help criminals, not you.
It'll take a good action to move my opinion in a good direction. Not just "they can do something; good things are 'something', therefore they can do good things."
ulyssessword
25d ago
Anything by Daniel Abraham (link to my old review), particularly the Long Price Quartet.
ulyssessword
26d ago
Do you have to drop it off at that specific apple store, or can you ship it to somewhere and get it shipped back? Even super-express return shipping is probably cheaper than $320.
ulyssessword
26d ago
Pretty sure. If you can find something better at predictions than the market is, you should be able to make tons of money (and incidentally make the market as efficient as your source).
ulyssessword
27d ago
Could be, but I'm blaming Microsoft regardless. Those ads have no place in the Microsoft Office Suite, regardless of who did it.
ulyssessword
27d ago
I'm following a lawyer's advice and will keep a tractor fender close by, at all times.
ulyssessword
28d ago
New Microsoft insanity.
I made a powerpoint presentation1, and went to save it. There were the normal options: Save, Save As, Export, Share, and one new one: Save as PDF.
Great, I thought. I want to save it as a PDF, so I will select the "Save as PDF" option. What a fool I was. Microsoft hadn't given me a convenient option to Save as PDF. It had embedded an ad for Adobe Acrobat Reader Pro's integration with their software, and offered me one free sample per 30 days, and the wonderful opportunity to buy (or rent, I assume) their software to unlock unlimited use and access many other features!
Needless to say, I went to "Save As", selected the .pdf filetype from the dropdown menu, and saved it as a pdf.
1 Not really, but Powerpoint some of the best software there is for simple image editing.
Show me the table entry for "brown adipose tissue heating" on a CO calculation and I'll believe it. Otherwise it's just part of the fudge factor.
Quantizing that component (and every other one) to individual variability is the weakness of CICO, as they can result in wildly different results based on unmeasured variables.
More options
Context Copy link