CS Lewis has something to say about that http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ResJud/1954/30.pdf
My read is that joyful isn’t saying this person isn’t really “trans” but that trans people are just role playing in their chosen sex. I agree. Sarah is a male even if he calls himself a female. Just like how an 80 pound girl isn’t fat even if she starves herself because she sees herself as fat. Objective reality trumps personal identification.
I agree with you. My question was in response to apparently not hating pedophiles.
I recall their being a dispute re the facts. I’ll look into it.
I think it is an abusive of language; both to try to change the way we think about something and to make words ugly. I hate the new speak.
Should we hate murderers? What about people like SBF who stole billions?
It could be a Chinese robber fallacy but it doesn’t mean it is and sadly there is no good evidence (since it would be career suicide for someone to publish data showing the connection).
It’s also not entirely clear that Moore was in fact trolling for minors.
Why use minor attracted person? First it is three words instead of pedophile. Like all woke language it is ugly. Second, it is often used to try to legitimize something we should keep highly hated.
Optically perhaps but who knows. The flip side is that the ADL has specifically been attacking Elon and Elon’s company so he has special animosity towards ADL. I find it likely Elon doesn’t hate Jews but does hate ADL. Given that, I’m fine giving him the benefit of the doubt.
He has a quick follow up where it seems he is pretty clearly talking about ADL Jews and their fellow travelers; not Jews writ large.
He then makes a boomercon claim of “can’t we just stop all racism”.
Yeah. Woke is not casting a female. Woke is casting a female lead and then making her perfect and the villains exclusively male.
I think one state solution with a population in Gaza that isn’t permitted to vote for the Knesset. But they could have a local parliament for civil governance.
I don’t think there can be a two state solution. There can only be a one state solution at this point in time with some devolved control. But that doesn’t mean the settlements are just or right to maintain.
I am not fond of these settlers.
I’m also not fond of the millions pouring over my border. Why am I supposed to care about the West Bank border and not care about my country’s border?
Part of me thinks it isn’t really hate for the strong and love for the weak but hate for the competent and love for the dysfunctional.
That’s the thing that I find interesting (the fact that hierarchies can’t change). Why? Is it that they hated the strong for so long that even when they aren’t strong the hate remains?
Refugees is basically the NGO way to enable large scale immigration.
There is also a ship of Theseus problem when it comes to human beings. It seems especially acute in kids. Actions a twelve year old takes can seriously impact a 30 year old being that is functionally a different being. Should we permit a 12 year old to do that? We’ve answered no in most things because we understand 12 year olds don’t have the wherewithal to make those kind of decisions. I don’t see why trans issues should go against the default; if anything it is an issue that should be more definite.
The big lie is that the clock isn’t ticking as fast as it used to tick.
What could be more an experience than raising a being you helped create? Is it jet setting? No. Is it rich in experience? Absolutely.
Ehh it had largely stopped by the time Trump came into place. Trump even had a planned exit. Biden to his credit continued with the exit but kind of fucked it up.
It’s been highly effective in getting people like Biden calling for a cease fire that heavily benefits Hamas.
Resisting is talking about after the war; not during.
Do you think this is the first time in military history that there was collateral damage? Do you think that conquered people always resist?
Also do you think it is good strategy to basically encourage human shields (provided side A arranges it so that if Party B attacks A, then B will cause collateral damage and be prevented from the collateral damage)? It seems like a really bad idea.

The idea that a child molester is not also a pedo just seems like trying to find a distinction. Are you honestly of the belief that a person raped a child has zero attraction to side child? That beggars belief. We are already talking about monsters, but that is beyond.
More options
Context Copy link