I do well for myself. So it isn’t being poor. But my wage should go further than it does and makes me wonder how the vast majority of people who make less than me get by.
That’s what makes me think it’s a house of cards. I think people are in more hawk and once the consumer spending stops Because credit limits are hit the fall could be sudden and extreme.
The economy seems perilous as well. It just sorta feels like the dam is about to break. I don’t have proof. Just a gut feeling that I think many share.
If you had the cartels carrying off numerous Americans, raping women and then parading their dead naked bodies Mexico themselves would declare war on the cartels because if they didn’t America would try to bury Mexico.
I would eliminate the tax deduction for gifts to NPOs and I would make the gifts received by NPOs taxable income. Whereas previously a rich person could give 60 dollars and government would effectively match 40 resulting in the NPO getting 100 now if the rich person wants to give the same post tax amount the NPO ends up with 60 of which they need to pay 12 of tax (before deductions for staffing, etc). You cut their resources almost in half.
Denethor and Aragorn were in the books similar people. The difference seems to be that Aragorn was rightfully the king and Denethor was not but had the desire (the will to power). Yet both wanted Gondor to succeed.
Or it seems based on the Twitter videos the Palestinians are raping the women, then killing them, and then parading around their naked bodies.
Bibi is right. Israel has an image of deadly effective military and the initial attack has bloodied that image.
So he needs to respond with overwhelming force to restore the image.
It isn’t about the particulars here but the next invasion.
You basically said the right should abandon their libertarian ethos.
I’m saying “before you do that, perhaps live up to it by eliminating subsidies.”
This is of course a conservative approach. Incremental change and see if it solves the problem.
I am pushing return to office. Our junior people across my practice (probably 40 people) have utterly stagnated.
You haven’t made an argument that the right should discard some of its principles. Perhaps before the right goes that far it should in the first case eliminate left wing subsidies (which are massive).
Jefferson didn’t literally believe that all men were given the same endowments. Instead, I think the idea is that each men is before the law be god the same. So the idea that one may be richer than another due to differential endowments may be natural without violating the notion that all men are equal.
Of course we see imperialism in communism. We see imperialism in ancient societies. We see imperialism in feudal societies. If we see imperialism I’m pretty much every society assigning it to capitalism seems…odd
I don’t think that’s the right metric. Let’s say there were 100 people and 80 were white and 20 were black. Full employment.
Now there are 120 people and 90 are white and 30 are black. If jobs scale with population, there would still be more total number of white jobs even if the percentage of white jobs decreased.
Common carrier.
-
The question (which I don’t know) is whether the young white population is the same size as the older white population. If so, then you’d expect new hires to roughly equal departures. On the other hand, if the younger population is larger, then you’d be hiring more POC relative to whites.
-
That per se isn’t a problem if the POC are more qualified compared to whites. However in my experience at a large firm we have relaxed standards for POC hires (and relaxed standards once hired) and we know the traditional tools to determine quality at more entry position are corrupted by college level affirmative action.
There were reports of peace talks that were close shortly after hostilities began but it was reported that Boris Johnson quashed it.
Also defending side clearly has agency. They can sue for peace but it may not be on terms they like.
If somehow the Democrats ended up in control of the house as a result of this (shutting down among other thing ers the impeachment process) Gaetz would be DOA.
Is there any evidence that Bowman was facing time pressure? The relevant questions are:
-
Did Bowman try the door prior to pulling the alarm?
-
How quickly did Bowman need to get to the house?
-
Were there other routes that would’ve taken the same time (eg the tunnels) without causing the obvious disruption?
Seems like those should be answered prior to granting Bowman charity. I don’t think Bowman is a high character guy given him almost assaulting Massie so I am biased against Bowman but it still — without more evidence really strains credulity that someone thought “I need to get to the house so let me pull this fire alarm to get out of here faster.” the thought process is just so foreign to me.
-
Was the door locked? Did he try to open it before he literally pulled a fire alarm?
-
Why not take the tunnels instead of pulling a fire alarm?
Agreed. Needs to be stopped.
I’ve been in a hurry before. I don’t think I’ve ever mistook a red fire alarm for a button to unlock a door.
This only makes sense in the context the lawmaker tried to open the door and it was locked. Is there any evidence to support that?
Note reports circulated yesterday that the Dems wanted to slow it down a bit to be able to read the CR. So there was motive.
I think it’s fine to think “there is something a little off if someone gets despondent over being preempted on a discussion board.” Look, I participate here because I think the people are interesting etc. But it isn’t like we are competing for Pulitzer Prizes etc. If someone preempted something, I’d think “well at least there is another person who thinks like me and seems reasonably intelligent” and go on my way. Being despondent is not psychologically healthy.
I’m going out on a limb and saying there is no way that happens. You really piss off the black female vote as it is a clear demotion for Kamala.
If the democrats could find a way to dump Biden and Kamala, they would. The problem they have is they need to dump both in a way that it doesn’t look like they passing over Kamala.

Conservative thought and art is rich, deep, and tragic. Any tradition that includes things as disparate as the Scottish Enlightment, the Classics, American Founding, the first fantasy novels, etc. is robust.
So it should appeal to the intellectual type. But perhaps the problem is that while there is a lot to learn there is perhaps little to say (the field is robust). So in publish or perish perhaps The incentives are against re trodding well trodded areas?
More options
Context Copy link