@FireRises' version of the Madagascar Plan will not end with the deportation ships (or chimneys) being dismantled once the last Black US citizen is deported to the general area from which his ancestors were kidnapped. Because once we have accepted that it is moral to get rid of undesirables who are statistically more likely to commit crimes, there is no reason not to apply the same standard to Whites, after all, HBD applies to them as well.
I definitely understand this point, but I'm kind of ambivalent toward it. If one were to argue like this, you could also argue against special education in schools because once we've put away a certain percentage of students with the lowest ability, we will just have to do the same thing again with the remaining students, infinitely, until there are no students left.
The issue is that most people have a specific threshold. There is a specific threshold of a student's ability that we can accept in schools, just like there is a specific threshold of crime that we cannot tolerate. This is particularly significant in some Eastern Asian countries where crime rates are effectively at zero (where you can leave your laptop on the street overnight without it being stolen, for example). If an effect of having third-world immigrants in your country is that an effectively zero crime rate society is now a society with a significantly noticeable crime rate, you have a problem. It's worth solving that problem, and you wouldn't need to repeat that process once you've come to the level of having an effectively negligible crime rate.
p
I definitely understand this point, but I'm kind of ambivalent toward it. If one were to argue like this, you could also argue against special education in schools because once we've put away a certain percentage of students with the lowest ability, we will just have to do the same thing again with the remaining students, infinitely, until there are no students left.
The issue is that most people have a specific threshold. There is a specific threshold of a student's ability that we can accept in schools, just like there is a specific threshold of crime that we cannot tolerate. This is particularly significant in some Eastern Asian countries where crime rates are effectively at zero (where you can leave your laptop on the street overnight without it being stolen, for example). If an effect of having third-world immigrants in your country is that an effectively zero crime rate society is now a society with a significantly noticeable crime rate, you have a problem. It's worth solving that problem, and you wouldn't need to repeat that process once you've come to the level of having an effectively negligible crime rate.
More options
Context Copy link