All schools should just focus on making robust, versatile physical activity programs. Everything else would fall into place once students are involved in numerous sports and hobbies. The only required courses should be English and basic arithmetic, since most of students don't actually care about anything else and just forget everything the moment they leave their classes. Besides, in the slim time slot state governments get to condition students into functional members of society, shouldn't they fixate on increasing the likelihood of each student living relatively happy lives free from the host of cognitive and physical defects associated with sedentary lifestyles? Just look at student athletes - most of them are good looking and happy. Then you look at students that spend most of their time sitting - students that stare at screens and students that study excessively - more of them are miserable, more of them have mental issues, and more of them just look like something went seriously wrong. These issues definitely seem like they are becoming more commonplace. When you look at the circumstances under which we evolved and the conditions that afflict people who sit around all day, it becomes obvious that we are basically like beautiful machines built to be in a state of perpetual, intricate motion - we persisted for most of our evolutionary history by outrunning prey in grasslands, having to predict the moves of wild herds and subsisting mostly off roots and shrubs with the occasional feast alongside brothers and sisters that you lived by and died by. But machines invariably break down when you try to push them outside the bounds of their engineering. I don't know, maybe this doesn't make sense. What do you guys think? It seems like everyone thinks schools are stupid but nobody actually tries to think of anything moderately different.
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is . . . not super-coherent, I'm afraid. I recommend trying to figure out what argument you're actually trying to make and doing a better job of supporting it; right now it's pretty much all over the place.
Given that this is your very first post I think you'd be better off posting in another thread, and I recommend doing that after you've refined this a bit.
More options
Context Copy link