@Corvos's banner p

Corvos


				

				

				
2 followers   follows 2 users  
joined 2022 December 11 14:35:26 UTC

				

User ID: 1977

Corvos


				
				
				

				
2 followers   follows 2 users   joined 2022 December 11 14:35:26 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1977

I did the same experiment. Opus weights Reddit and Twitter text much more highly (according to self-report) so it really only knows prolific posters from the old site, preferably ones who were retweeted a lot. It thinks I’m 2rafa.

Excellent! What are you using for the sprites and the illustrations? GPT Image? I was using Kling AI to make an original visual novel but I haven't got round to it recently. It's pretty good though.

You jammy bugger! Congrats. That's the dream right there.

I saw the same dynamic in projects that I was part of - you can absorb a surprising number of people without really meaningfully improving performance.

For some reason, he idea of bullshit jobs is one has immense staying power.

Maybe we’ve just had different life trajectories, but I think this is because most people have had one of those jobs.

The original thesis labelled a bullshit job as one where the person self-reports that “the world would be the same or better if I didn’t come in to work” and I think huge numbers of people can relate to sitting down at their desk and doing something that really just doesn’t need to be done but that they are being told to do anyway.

it’s helpful to have a mix of wary skeptics and early adopters for many kinds of technology

Granted! And I'm been the wary skeptic on a lot of things. In this case, given the unique and potentially transformative nature of the technology, I have a certain amount of sympathy for the managers who decided that the greybeards needed some experience with AI products so that they can judge from a position of knowledge not prejudice. Ideally that should employ the carrot rather than the pointy stick, but occasionally you still need the pointy stick.

I also coerce my interns into using it (and pay for the subscriptions myself). In that case it's more for knowledge lookup more than code, because in my opinion getting used to having a personal tutor permanently on call is the best gift I can give them.

It really, really depends, especially since I’m talking senior in age terms ie 50+. But we eventually had to fire a 3d artist for refusing point blank to learn the industry-standard tool that the rest of the team was using, for example. He was perfectly fast on what he had but it didn’t scale and he couldn’t work with the rest of the team.

That aside, a lot of the programmers I worked with considered themselves gurus, and were very invested in the practices that they had been taught at their expensive computer science degree. They were legitimately good at what they did but they clearly considered LLMs an inferior replacement for their skills. The kind of people who insist on VIM over an IDE and will argue for days about whether Python private functions should be prefixed with underscore.

Tl;dr: a lot of programmers are genuinely in a rut, and a lot of others are more interested in writing beautiful code than solving problems.

But Dickens was a hugely popular author! He did portray these attitudes, mostly as being from a past age, and thus created and rode a huge wave of public sympathy for the British poor.

Broadly I imagine it was:

  1. We think that these tools are going to be very important.
  2. The more senior the dev, the more they tend to resist even trying out new tools or workflows.
  3. Therefore we will literally force you for at least the next six months.

I have some sympathy for this perspective, having seen two very skilled devs just become fundamentally obsolete and impossible to work with because they refused to give up using tools from twenty/thirty years ago.

  • This particular kind of plot twist is known at the folie adieu, which is French for "are you fucking kidding me?".

Great book.

2016: We should Unite the Right!

2024: We have United the Right, sweeping all before us! Look at all these guys with us!

2026: ….yay?

Yes, I see. I remember being very worried when I was doing the paperwork for my heart op and saw that risk of death was perhaps 1:200 to 1:100.

Then I got to the ward, looked around at my fellow patients (all over 70 and mostly very frail) and thought ohhh... And I felt better :P

I wish I understood the nature of resilience in general, really. The fact that the brain continues to work essentially as normal when doused in brain-altering chemicals like alcohol is really staggering when you think about it.

Then perhaps I was harsh. I still don't think it's really for me - the 'isn't gender interesting' stuff palled for me halfway through le Guin's Left Hand of Darkness when I was 21 - but I take your point.

Re: WW2 there was full male conscription and rationing of every foodstuff except bread, heavy propaganda, the works.

“Tyranny” has a moral valence one can agree or disagree with but it was extremely authoritarian. And as with COVID it was very dangerous long term because certain segments of society loved it - Labour tried hard to make rationing a permanent feature of British life long after food shortages had been resolved.

To be honest, I got about ten pages into that book a decade ago. Read the bit about how their society considers it taboo and obscene to gender people and noped right on out.

Of course. I just read and wondered if some patients had an innate susceptibility to side effects while others never did. Would be interesting if so.

As a lay person, it’s always complicated looking at lists of side effects. Take a side effect of:

Very rare: stroke.

Does that mean that every time you take it, you are rolling a 1:10,000 chance of stroke. Or is it 1e-9 for a young healthy person and 1:10 for a very elderly person who’s already had one stroke? And so on.

at a relatively continent 6.2% rate of nocturnal enuresis

Per dose or per patient?

You’re welcome :)

Can't do spoiler tags multi-paragraph, I think. You need separate tags per paragraph. The preview operates on slightly different rules. Click 'view source' on my post.


(FC3 spoilers again, really don't know what's going on with the spoiler tags, they're showing up for me in the preview and everything.) The game doesn't punish you for being a murder-hobo. That being said, I'd be delighted if Far Cry 3 gave an honest Far Cry 4 secret ending in the beginning, and treated you to a "Congratulations! You did the reasonable thing and didn't engage in violence. Here's a fully-animated spread of Vaas raping and murdering you and all of your friends to death! Sure is a good thing you didn't try to fight back, right?"

If you as the game developer need to cheat and take away my agency when the mechanics you have given me up until that point say I can do X, because you need me to do not-X for your story to land, you are a bad game developer and/or a bad writer. The logical consequence of fully-engaging with murder-hobo gameplay is not "I decide to kill my friends for no reason and then the retarded Bad End happens", it's a cut to Citra's perspective as she is waiting for you to approach, is concerned that you are taking so long, turns to look a the captives, and when she turns back all of the Rakyat are dead and Jason is standing in front of her, machete out, with vacant stare and happy smile, because the fun isn't over and now he gets to do all the outpost liberations again. I buy that a drugged-out witch would delude herself into thinking "Aha, I am manipulating the American super-soldier into doing my bidding!" and not noticing that he's killing people he has reason to kill, and that this started before she met him, or even that the last three times her brother literally killed him and the hundreds of times he got maimed by bullets, fire, or crocodiles he just casually came back from the dead.

If the game disapproves of my choice to engage with it, then the game is dumb, and if the game is instead offering implicit approval of Vaas and Citra by saying that they weren't punished for their own murder-hoboism, then the game is just the authors engaging in contempt and sneering at their audience instead of trying to make a point, and said sneering says much more about them then it does about me.

I see, thank you for clarifying. As I understand it, these other sects include Greek and Russian Orthodox but that's about it, right?

I think, and @OracleOutlook will put me right if I go wrong, that the Catholic Church considers that Christ founded the church and gave supernatural authority (the ability to perform sacred rites and have them be genuine rites, not placating) to Peter and only Peter. Likewise Peter received the authority to reveal Christ’s truth. The Church in a very real sense is Christ, the Body of Christ on Earth, it’s what he left do us.

So rather than the world being made of Catholics, non-Catholic denominations, and non-Catholics, the world is split into:

  • Catholics
  • People who do not yet know that they are Catholics (ie that they belong to God)
  • People who deliberately reject the Church.

Everybody except those who have wilfully, deliberately cut themselves off from the Catholic Church are in communion with the Pope.

Nothing much to say except awesome analysis. I quite liked DA2 despite the copy-paste, the scaling of it worked well and the characters were great. But your write-up is better.

“You” here is mkc. It’s a ‘knock it off, both of you” post.

For me it worked, because I genuinely started to get carried away during the white phosphorous scene just like in the support mission in CoD: Modern Warfare, and when a big white blob appeared on the screen I enthusiastically went "Ha! Got you all!" before really thinking. So the reveal that I just killed a bunch of civilians felt like me and Walker were to blame. I guess you and @Dean have better fire control .

While I agree with both you and Scott that people who have supposedly been guided by meditation to transcend the self do not seem to show the godlike serenity one might expect, I don't think that this is a very kind or helpful way of putting it.

I think Brave Story uses the term ijiwaru baba when MC's mother is forbidding him to see his beloved uncle, with whom she has a vendetta.