sun_the_second
could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server
No bio...
User ID: 2725
If I intended to separate from her forever, which I'd be doing in a similar case, I'd cut contact before she could tell me whether she did or didn't do it.
As I understand it you feel like you are responsible for a child regardless of whether she had it solely to suck money from you or not. I can't help with that. My view on how much DNA matters in terms of creating a metaphysical link between father and child is dim. If she schemed to do it, she can have the whole damn responsibility for raising a third kid in the third world.
Lesson for the future I guess, wrap it up. Especially when fucking strippers. Especially in the third world.
I would assume that the pregnancy is, simply put, not real. It might be a lot harder to believe she's lying to you after spending all that time with her, but from the outside it looks like Scamming Rich Yankee 101. Doubly so if she's a stripper since strippers are well known for making guys feel they love them.
If she's actually pregnant I doubt she's actually going to be much worse off than usual seeing as she already has two and managed. If you want to be guilt free then send just enough for an abortion then delete her number and block her.
Books should be structured as expandable trees. One-paragraph summary of each chapter, expandable into summaries of component points/stories, expandable into the full text. Can read the whole book in five minutes or five hours.
I hope the author means nonfiction books.
Soviet levels of power were not granted by God of Thought Experiments from above, they were achieved by mobilizing large numbers of people to violence with arguments such as "this guy over here is better off than you - it was at your expense, go lynch the kulak". I do not think shrimp welfare is as persuasive an argument.
I assumed that if they advertise as a barbershop they might be using straight razors.
No phobia against HIV-positive people? In an establisment handling sharp objects that touches multiple people per day? Well, at least they had the decency to tell on themselves.
Under the current regime, the ghetto thug AND the glass-jaw nerd are granted "adulthood" status with all rights that entails by the mere fact of turning eighteen. Do we think this is optimal?
I mean, the optimal test would exclude the thug while including the nerd. It would be nice if the incentives were aligned to teach the nerd some toughness that he is capable of learning along the way, but it shouldn't come at a cost of putting thugs ahead. That would be a perversion of what I believe a society of legal adults should look like (i.e. it shouldn't look like a hunter-gatherer tribe).
I'm unclear why this seems like an ardurous burden to you.
Perhaps he believes that having to assess documentation to ensure that the state has allowed you and the young woman in question to bang is going to be deeply unsexy. Not unlike mandating STD test results or consent forms beforehand.
I do not believe emulating African tribes is a good idea when it comes to maturity rituals, either with this or your idea from the other post about getting beaten up by 10 guys in a row. Firstly, it doesn't seem correct to me that a ghetto thug should be ahead of a glass-jaw nerd on any maturity test in a first-world country (even if the thug is objectively more "fit" for life, the status is wasted on him). Secondly, immediate pain is not a well-optimized maturity test for a first-world country regardless. What brings prosperity in first-world countries is long-term thinking and the ability to lock in over months and years. Not enduring physical pain for half an hour.
Even if Gom Jabbar tests a necessary quality it is far from sufficient.
Sure, as long as you assign 0 value to a bum, you will always come out positive when weighing "preserving a public space" versus "taking N bums out behind the shed".
I do not believe that "Americans who think positively of Viet Cong" and "Americans who know Viet Cong's calling card was using innocent villagers as cover" are sets that overlap too much.
If it is damning of anyone it is damning of the Hamas militant. I do not recall any Western warrior mythos that would permit a warrior to hide behind children. At most it would happen once before the warrior realizes that the enemy is actually not bluffing, and then comes out to fight.
A police department's job is to protect the civilians of their state. An army's job is not to protect the civilians of other states.
Magic did change in a few centuries, as for mundane technology I don't recall anything specific.
Car's no longer a gateway to socializing with peer young women and having sex?
where Peter Pan gets slapped by a girl in his own movie
My impression was that girls slapped protagonists a lot in their own movies in the Old Movies. It's what girls do.
The first episode (and the first arc) of Jojo are really far from what people usually like about it.
The weather's probably part of the reason. At the moment, I'd probably go out into the street in only my underwear too if it was socially acceptable.
But if you have 40 civilans dead for every one of your soldiers, then it becomes reasonable to suppose that you have a callous disregard for the lives of the civilian population
If the enemy sniper somehow is always accompanied by 40 civilians, which one of us is callously disregarding their lives - me or the sniper? It seems pretty clear which one of us would prefer there to be fewer civilians on the site and which one would like more.
There is nothing I've seen that would indicate that people somehow became not ok with it once the ratio went slightly over 10 to 1. Rather it seemed to be that Israel became mainstream news, that's all. People whose special interest was the Israel-Palestine conflict have been harping about "genocidal settlers" well before the war.
If no one wanted that land in Africa and Latin America why should the Jews?
Your schtick of acting like Israel is the only country in history to ever do naked conquest as opposed to simply being the most recent one is getting stale. At least when the bleeding heart progs do it, their historical and ethical myopia is consistent. When you combine trying to paint Israel as evil for the actions of Israel and trying to paint Israel as evil because Jews have been uniquely evil for 2000 years it's just incoherent.
They will not "go find a new home" because getting in on the business of colonizing/genociding/enlightening the savages that the western civilization has been enjoying for the past 2000 years is strictly better for them than staying at the complete mercy of said western civilization.
Are we Russel's Teapotting whoring now?
Any stream on the internet to an audience of more than zero runs the risk of someone screencapping it unbeknownst to you. This really should be in the "basic internet safety" checklist, right after "once it's on the internet it's on the internet forever".
- Prev
- Next
Eh, it was comprehensible enough, the most mistranslated part was "reacted really disgusting me" vs what I assume was meant to be "reacted really disgusted with me" - and the true meaning can be error-corrected from context. The AIsloppy editing destroyed more meaning, originality, dare I say soul than the lack of English skills of the author.
More options
Context Copy link