This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Time. You need time, preferably decades with no huge triggers on either side. You need the family and friends of those killed on both sides to have their emotions less raw and possibly to die off, then with fewer direct immediate victims of violence you might be able to move forward.
Notably for this you would need moderate leadership on both sides, who can slowly push for slight de-escalation, year by year. It can't be immediate, they would be killed or replaced. Probably propped up and supported by external actors. Then in 20 years or 30 you won't have peace, but you'll have a simmering conflict with many fewer victims. Hopefully you'll also have seen economic improvements and wealthier, safer people are more likely to agree to peace.
In other words it kind of looks like what happened before October 7th, where there would be mostly ineffectual rocket attacks, it just would have needed a Hamas leadership who weren't plotting October 7th and a Israeli leadership that were reining in the various settlers slowly. Both sides need someone who is willing to be just unpopular enough to dial down the heat, but not unpopular enough to get assassinated or deposed.
The US supporting both sides contingent on violence not being too excessive and putting pressure on both to come to the table, over and over and over again for the next 20 years.
Sure, if you can wish into place a Palestinian leadership who would not attempt to butcher Israelis for 20 or 30 years, then the plan could work.
But you can't! Hamas is here. They aren't going quietly. And they aren't some exogenous force. By all accounts I've seen, Palestinians support Hamas, and Palestinians supported the October 7 attacks. A plan that relies on an unachievable counterfactual isn't a plan.
More options
Context Copy link
Time has not diminished the Jewish desire for Zionism. If we are to give credit to the Palestinians, they seem equally determined. Would you give them two thousand years to get over it?
To paraphrase the Kingdom of Heaven, as Saladin speaks to Balian: 'Jerusalem is nothing and everything!'
They don't have to get over their desire, many Catholics in NI still want Northern Ireland to become part of the Republic. But being willing to fight and die for something when you are comfortable and treated well and none of your immediate family have been killed, is a very different proposition.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link