This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Most people (and the law) consider it meaningfully different to use a nail gun on a cabinet as opposed to a person. Yes, you can describe "killing a person" and "remodeling a cabinet" as both "tasks that may be more efficiently performed by an expert," but I don't think it takes "political correctness" to say that collapsing the two acts elides an important distinction.
But the argument being made above by /u/westerly here isn't that there is a distinction between homicide and carpentry, it's that failing to do something personally indicates a lack of willingness to do it. That's clearly false in most other usages. It's an attempt to smuggle in the conclusion, that life is sacred and assisted suicide is wrong, by assuming that assisted suicide isn't a method of suicide. In every other case contacting an expert to perform a task properly is as or more indicative of serious desire to perform a task properly than is doing it yourself.
Elsewhere in the thread it's pointed out that many suicide attempts are "cries for attention." But if you were looking for attention you wouldn't contact an expert with a 100% success rate at killing you, you'd pick a method with a lower chance of actually killing you. Which is all of them, really. To my knowledge Euthanasia has never failed to kill someone, while I've heard of methods as "certain" as a shotgun failing and leaving the would-be suicide with half a face. Nothing indicates more seriousness than getting an expert involved who will never fail to kill you once they get started.
To stick with the analogy, I take on little DIY projects for fun as much as to use the thing I'm making afterward, and I'm not too serious about them. When I'm serious about getting something done for use reasons, I contact a professional.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link