This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
AI has proven to be an ineffective job destroyer. Any jobs lost due to AI are replaced by other jobs, or instead of AI destroying jobs, AI assists jobs. Artists will learn how to use Stable Diffusion, such as tweaking keywords, templates, and settings, similar to artists learning how to use 3d and photo editing software, such as for advertising and Hollywood special effects. In spite of GP3, publishing is booming, like on Substack and Amazon. Entire industries are being built around AI, which means more jobs. Artists always find a way to hang on.
I'm personally not too interested in the current iteration of AI and how effective of a job destroyer it is.
The meta conversation or the "real question" is that "what should be done if there were an AI that is effective at replacing all jobs, or hell most of the jobs". AI being able to generate images at dalle2 quality was science fiction just a few years ago, so AI that is effective becoming a possibility in the near future is not a stretch.
Kind of a "If you are discussing the present, you are already left behind" sort of deal.
My opinion on the above is "let em take it, let em take all the jobs! we'll see what happens". The future is too uncertain to lose any sleep over.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link