This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yeah, but I see this as partly a problem caused by the giant hole left by the aforementioned kudzu when they cut it out.
For example: Varys and Tyrion HAVE to be stupid cause there's no other way to stop Dany from just killing Cersei but this then makes it hard to take their ambivalence about Dany seriously as foreshadowing. All of the political complexity of Westeros has to be removed or Cersei would never last as Queen.
And so on and so on.
I can certainly agree that part of the problem was the writers (foolishly, I would say) choosing to cut points that seemed irrelevant in the books that already exist. But I don't think that was most of it. If the plot had issues but the writers had at least tried to paper over it with a justification, then I could maybe see that being the major problem. But more often, there are problems that they don't even try to paper over it. They are stringing together scenes without even the thinnest veneer of logic for how the world progressed from one point to the next.
Case in point: the S7 arc where Dany loses one of the dragons to the Others. The Others had Jon Snow and his men trapped on an island (which the Others can access easily) for a long time. We don't know how long, but it stands to reason that even as the dragon flies it takes a day or two for Dany to cross the entire continent as she flies to his rescue. Why did the Others not just kill Jon and his men immediately, then leave? They never even attempt to explain that. The fan theory was that the Night King somehow knows that Dany is coming with her dragons, and he wants to score an undead dragon. Fine - how does he know that? Again, not explained (even if that was the intent, which who knows). The whole story just makes no logical sense, and there isn't even an attempt to try to make it work. They just jammed characters into scenes and went "eh good enough".
It's stuff like that which makes me blame the show writers the most. I think a competent writer stuck with difficult material will at least try to make it make sense somehow. They probably won't succeed, but there will at least be a recognizable attempt. The GoT writers didn't even try, which leads one to believe the issues didn't even occur to them - ergo, they must be massively incompetent. And that is a far bigger problem with the latter seasons of GoT than the difficult plot they inherited from GRRM.
Yeah, I can only assume they were under constraints and overmatched since some decisions are so bad, even by the standards of the bad writing on the show (the most egregious might be sending the unarmed into the Crypts of Winterfell). Some of those decisions are the "Somehow, Palpatine has returned" of fantasy: they ring of "it's 11PM and the essay is due, fuck it.". They just didn't have it in them to bridge the chasms and gave up.
I just think a lot of the problems we criticize the most have a much earlier and understandable genesis.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link