This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Nerds never wield power unless it is justification for the regime, thermidor was fast approaching and South Asian abuse of migration is a Schelling point most would agree on, may not be for Hindus (H1B) but Afghans and Pakistanis are people with terrible reputations, you can go after them and get easy wins. It gets hard to defend things like bachhabaazi, cousin marriage alongside rape gangs.
Peter Thiel was not publicly tweeting about mass migration, crime stats and deportations on the heels of Trump's victory on his own social media platform, Musk is. He is revered by millions as a literal hero and his defence of the tech right means that the tech right would now defend him too, in many ways what he did with the h1b was quite helpful. He basically got the tech right to stick together, conceded his point later and the tech right now has to stick with him.
He conceded the points later, Trump publicly was more charitable to h1bs than Elon was by the end of last week, even rebuking Richard Hannania for it, btw, Moldbug did write a good piece on it.
Having your son become trans did. Biden got more donations than Trump from techies btw.
He also tweets about Sam Hyde and follows 1488 posters on Twitter alongside yours truly. Quite obviously all of tech elites have obvious intelligence agency tie-ups, god-tier PR and marketing where they are made to look extremely favorable so it would be hard to take anything he says at face value for now.
Untrue, had you had anything violent happen as Kulak suggested both of these would have been brought up as potential signs of failed regime change or terrorist attacks from the past, now they are not relevant as the same energy is being dissipated in attempts to redpill elite normies. It seems to not be going bad unless you are named Charles Johnson or Groyper, you can post anything you want on Twitter, period.
Most people to be honest don’t actually care about either one. The people who care, for the most part care for the reason that the prosecution on 1/6 is overboard and despite the whining from the status quo elites probably did almost no damage to the public at all.
What has done damage to the median American is the status quo. They’re paying a lot more for goods, having to tighten their belts. Often their city is less safe than in years past, and they’re more concerned with the education their kids are getting in their schools. I think even had the 1/6 event resulted in 4 more years of Trump, the general public would be much more concerned about mundane concerns like gas/food prices, indoctrination in schools, the money shipped to Ukraine, Ashville and the hurricane relief, and dozens of other real world concerns.
To be brutally honest, I think that very few people actually care what form of government they have or who runs it. What they want is peace, affordable living, safety, and freedom from too much intrusion into their private lives. If they could get that with democracy, they’d enjoy it, but if ending democracy made their material life better, they would not care.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link