@MaiqTheTrue's banner p

MaiqTheTrue

Renrijra Krin

1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 November 02 23:32:06 UTC 

				
User ID: 1783


				
				
				

			

		

	














	


		


			



	

		

			

			

				

					

						

							
						

						

							
							

								
MaiqTheTrue


								

								

								
								
								

								
							
					
 
				


				
Renrijra Krin

				
				
				

				

					1 follower  

					follows 0 users  

					joined 2022 November 02 23:32:06 UTC
				


				
					

					
No bio...

				

				

				

				

				

					

					

					
					
					

					
User ID: 1783


					
					
					
				

			


					

						
					



		

	

 











			
			

			
			

			




	


		

			
‎

			

				
				

					Hour
					Day
					Week
					Month
					Year
					
				

			


			
‎

			

	
	

	 Hot Bump Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
	



		

	






	

		
		

		
		
	

	

  







		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 14, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I’m not going to deny that at least some people think it’s nefarious.  It’s just that it’s much more likely that FEMA is bean counting supplies gathered by other charities before letting them through to satisfy a process that’s in their handbook.  Standardizing is generally okay.  But then again this is a situation where time loss means dead bodies and everybody knows it.  It’s not exactly the same as managing accounts in an office.  The time spent adding traceability to a process in an office job and even using that to trace that information isn’t going to cause much of a problem because you have the luxury of as much time as you need to do that.  If the cost of traceability is death, then I think honestly it’s a bit more critical to push back and say “why is it important to have a complete inventory of what First Baptist Church of Asheville is distributing when that will delay aid by a whole day and people will die without food?”  Sure, there are some bits that you need to hold the line on, but trying to follow a checklist to the letter in a disaster zone just adds delay where none was needed.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 14, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think a lot of this is down to history.  Jewish history is full of “we thought we were safe, then the gentiles started forming mobs — again,” and recent Israeli history has been one filled with terror attacks, suicide bombings, shootings, etc.  with a history like that, paranoia, and thus extreme reaction to threats is just part of the deal.  From the point of view of Israel, if the country fails, it’s only a matter of time before they’re back in Nazi camps.  And the only thing standing between Jews and Nazi camps is the Israeli security apparatus.  So, unlike the USA where military forces are generally only used abroad and we haven’t had a mainland invasion since 1812, Israel has a history of exile and being victimized all the time, finally getting a state, having the surrounding countries try to kill them, nearly daily terror strikes.  There’s no sense that letting up will do any good here.  The US military can follow international law because it’s not at risk nor are its civilians.  If we decided to fight a war with silly string instead of guns, the state still isn’t at risk. If Israel doesn’t go full bore, they risk being destroyed.  So while the US military wouldn’t shoot preteens, it’s never been in the same position.  They never had to think about whether the kid will grow up to try to kill them.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 14, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


The deep state isn't some nefarious ingroup. It's a useful umbrella term to capture the emergent ideology of DC's upper-middle-class bureaucracy. But that’s it. It personifies the incompetence inherent in all bureaucracy. It is as faceless as it is boring. However, Trump's rendition of the deep state is akin to a singular eldritch horror that seeks to destroy all that we hold dear. In this narrative, the deep state is held responsible for all of America's problems, and Trump is heralded as the savior.




It’s not nefarious no, but it’s also completely absurd that people aren’t allowed to distrust the organs of state that rarely serve their purposes, and quite often serve to stymie peasant attempts to better themselves economically.  The organs of the deep state are finely tuned to follow procedures that protect themselves from scrutiny, and provide deniability to anyone that might be blamed if something goes wrong.  It is not geared to serving its purpose and regulating without being destructive.


OSHA is supposed to protect workers, but quite often the opposite happens as rules that do little to prevent serious injury often make it difficult to impossible to run a business.  Which makes it a much cheaper and often better idea to have things made in China or India so they aren’t fined because of some cosmetic problems that have nothing to do with safety.


FEMA is so regulation heavy that it’s more a hinderance than a help in a disaster.  Much of the aid in Helene is getting through despite FEMA, not because of it.  And because of this the people no longer want FEMA around.  I can’t blame them when a bunch of construction workers with heavy equipment can rescue more people in a couple of hours than FEMA and those they contract with can manage in a week.


It’s poor customer service.  The people are not getting better transportation from the department of transportation, better education from the department of education, and so on.




Of course the crazies ate it up. And given Trump's recent behavior, of course they're turning against him.




They’re not necessarily “crazy”.  I think they’re wrong in the sense that these groups don’t wish them to suffer.  But at the same time the deep state serves the deep state and is mostly a jobs program for elites who are otherwise unemployable who have no idea how to get things done.  They follow procedures off cliffs because they are not skilled enough to know how things actually work so they can’t or won’t bend the rules to get things moving in the right direction.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 14, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
One thing I noticed about politics Now vs 2000 is that basically politics itself has become much more of a lifestyle than it used to be.  There are entirely different default activities, and different fashion sense and different music and so on.  And now there are political themed shopping — bulletproof coffee and the like.  And I think that’s making polarization worse, as it makes almost every decision made at least potentially political.  I find it kind of exhausting tbh to have so much be political when it doesn’t matter that much.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 14, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think the partisanship and the entrenched powers points in the other direction— hypernormalization.  The hyper-normalizing simply means that most people have simply accepted that this is how it is and ever will be because the people in charge simply have no solutions to the issues at hand.  This goes for democrats and republicans, and I think it explains the Cult around MAGA and Trump.  Trump is popular because he’s giving hope of a world actually better than what we have now, and doing so in a way that’s very concrete.  Not “slow the growth of inflation by X% over the next Y months” but “I want you to be able to afford groceries and gasoline again.”  Not “we’re going to deal with the root causes of X,” but “we’re going to actually fix this.”  Not “well, we should give illegals a court date,” but “we’re throwing them out.”  It’s a similar appeal to other populist candidates— they’re addressing the real needs of real people with a promise that they can actually fix it, and of course they get very popular with ordinary people who want things to be more like the past where one income would feed and house a family (in an actual house even if it was small), where social deviance was not taught as normal to elementary school kids, where walking down the streets in major cities was not an open invitation to be assaulted and robbed, and where you didn’t see drug dealers selling openly on the streets.


I don’t think any party can actually deliver on getting us back to the turn of the last century where such things were possible.  It’s the slow decline of the western world into moral decadence, sloth, corruption and decay.  Such has been the way of every other civilization to exist.  We’re in the late empire stages of decline.  And unless we right the ship, she’s going to sink into darkness until some other civilization pulls up from the ashes of the Rules Based International Order to create something brand new.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think organs of consensus building are inherent to any group human activity much like a dominance hierarchy is.  If you smash the current ones, you will find others taking their place.  Think tanks are probably more effective than they look to us normal serfs on the outside of the power structure.  Most of their work is laundered through the organs of consensus aimed at us — mostly media, political talking points, and influencers.


I don’t think you fight most of these things by destroying the think tanks that already exist.  You do so, much like other institutions that build consensus, by building alternatives.  The greatest enemy of the public schools are home schools as they effectively remove certain children from the early indoctrination curriculum that schooling is meant to provide.  The greatest threat to universities are trade schools and children skipping college to go into trades.  Current media and social media are best countered by alternatives.  If I can watch media with a different perspective, or news slanted in a different direction, or listen to music that doesn’t line up with Consensus, then the Consensus loses control.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
They’re largely propaganda machines in my opinion.  They exist to create consensus around an idea and to craft legislation to turn that consensus into law.  The “ideological tax” you speak of is how those groups get the money to get the job done.


It seems to go in stages with the propaganda stage going first.  Issue comes up.  Think tanks find research to support the ideological agenda the think tank has.  Then they issue white papers that summarize that research and debunk the opposition narrative.  At the same time they issue the talking points that get injected into the media by aligned media outlets and politicians.  At that point they start talking about legislation to fix the issue or blocking bad legislation.


I don’t think you can get rid of them entirely.  They’re a big part of how the elites control culture.  If you weaken or destroy that system another will be created or co-opted.  Power is power.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
To play devils advocate here, if the system is completely broken and unable to produce a good result on anything that matters, maybe a defect bot is exactly what you need. Cooperation with a system that doesn’t work doesn’t fix that system.  I think that our systems are so broken at this point that we either do the major fixes we need or consign ourselves to the scrap heap of history where future civilizations will wonder how we let it all fall apart.


I don’t like Trump at all, I’d very much rather have anyone else.  But on the other hand the hour is late and if we wait for something better we might be doing so in a completely failed state instead of merely a failing one.  A third of Americans can’t read.  We can’t handle disaster recovery, fix potholes, build aircraft, or fix train tracks.  Large portions of most cities are no go zones, often featuring open air drug markets.  Is Trump or any other “defect bot” going to actually be able to fix that?  It’s one in a million.  On the other hand the system that you think we should encourage cooperation with has failed in most respects.  Risky surgery or slow decline into death?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
It’s a lot easier to “corral your radical elements” when you have a firm grasp on most institutions and are firmly in power.  They essentially don’t need the votes and vocal support of the far left wing.  They can tell them to sit down and shut up because even if that 3-5% of far left tankie communist group stays home on Election Day, democrats will still have substantial power, influence, and support.  They will have 240 or so electoral votes in the can.  They own the deep state, the university, the media, and so on.  The GOP doesn’t have th3 luxury of telling the far right to bugger off.  They lose if that faction stays home, and if they lose, a lot of the current project of trying to reconquer the institutions will be put off for another generation or two.


And I would consider Mises and Heritage foundation to be fairly galaxy brained institutions.  They put out plenty of projects exploring how a conservative might go on to solve pressing issues in our society.  There are also church institutions that give reasons for social conservative ideas.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
It depends.  The health of the state is so bad at this point that I think keeping the status quo might be worse long term.  The government we have, the old guard political class cannot actually solve problems, fix things, or come up with new ideas.  FEMA can’t handle hurricane, but Cajun navy and private charities can.  The government can’t handle education or health or roads.  Trump might well be the shakeup we need.  But I’m not sure because the amount of state capacity that will be wasted fighting every single step back will likely make it all worse.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Friday Fun Thread for October 11, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Honestly I’d be much more inclined to believe if physicists could explain how FTL or even near light travel is possible without an entire planet’s worth of mass for fuel.  And NASA or SETI finding signals of intelligent beings.  Or you know those huge space telescopes, it’s going to make me interested if they find evidence of life and especially intelligent life in space.


I’ve never heard the History Channel Alien guy explain why JWT or Hubble never found an inhabited planet.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I’ve always seen that as a perception of social class.  The left sees itself as the upper class ruling elites and the conservatives are seen as lower class.  They’re “the help” the kind of people who fix your toilet, or install your new energy efficient air conditioner, or the ones who cook in restaurants or make stuff in factories or raise your food.  They’ve called it Flyover country for decades because they see it as the places where the losers live.


I think at least half of the conspiracy theories started as jokes.  They know that their ruling class sees them as idiots, and they might well choose to have a bit of fun pretending to believe in weird stuff just to annoy their betters.  Jewish Space Lasers is certainly a joke — I know of no one anywhere who believes that the Jews have space lasers.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think the thing with Trump is that like or hate him, he’s not beholden to traditional politics or norms.  He’s the guy who wants to get things done and build things.  Whether or not he’s right about all of this, I think is up to personal opinion.  But what scares people is that he sees those norms and systems as obstacles to be overcome rather than rules to obey at cost of doing the thing.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Friday Fun Thread for October 11, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think I might go as an Amish woman or something.  I dunno.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I mean wouldn’t that just be plain old ordinary network security protocols.  I’ll agree that you aren’t going to get to 100% trust here, but the point I’m making is that we can do a pretty good job with similar things all the time, yet somehow in the case of securing the election, it’s like there’s a bizarre mental block where it’s not worth trying to do these kinds of things because we won’t get to 100% trust or 100% hack-proof immediately.  We trust that kind of technology to get packages around and to validate property transfers and bank transfers all the time.  Nobody I know is thinking that UPS is going to lose their packages.  The big problem isn’t UPS losing packages, it’s porch pirates.


Now secondly, providing that you keep the original ballots, finding the back door hack is dead easy because you have the data that produced the original count, and if you recount the same ballots, you get the same numbers and if you don’t, there’s a problem.  There are also fraud detection techniques that are known in statistics and forensic accounting that would be fairly useful in determining whether the results on the computer are likely fraud.  Even if none of that in isolation is enough, if you do good chain of custody, have good network security, have the original ballots, and use forensic accounting and data science, this system would probably be more secure than most other systems that we use daily.  At some point, it’s good enough.


And I think a lot of the distrust is exact that nobody is willing to put forth the effort to secure the election to the same standard as even my Amazon order.  In fact, when someone tries to add a layer of security, even fairly common sense stuff like government IDs, the resounding answer is NO.  And so you can’t shakes the suspicions because it often looks like the government is hostile to the idea of making the system harder to tamper with or vote without having the right to do it.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think it’s possible.  If you have a barcode on an object that allows you to track it across a network, and you don’t necessarily have To know what the contents are.  UPS can track millions of packages from warehouse to multiple locations to your front door by scanning the barcode on the box and uploading that to a server.  Blockchain can be tracked without needing to know what the “package” contains or represents.  This isn’t a ned to invent new technology.  We could do things like this now with pretty muc( off the shelf technology.  Scan the barcode on every ballot on paper at the point it’s cast.  Scan every time the ballots move.  If you see ballots arrive that cannot be traced to a precinct, then you’re likely seeing fake ballots.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think this might be a just so story.  There was no serious investigation, no evidence presented, no experts testified in congress.  So it’s sort of an odd proposition to suggest that a thing nobody even attempted to do could not have possibly changed anyone’s mind.


The position became very entrenched by now because every cathedral organ was screaming at them that “there was no fraud”, telling them that these were either stupid or bigoted for daring to think that, and telling them there was no reason to bother to ask questions, let alone investigate anything.  At the same time the alternative press is reporting on reports of anomalies, there’s the president talking about fraud and filing lawsuits.  Those lawsuits were not taken seriously and were dismissed on standing.  In short the public was very loudly told nothing to see here, and no investigations happened.


Imagine the opposite.  There are claims of fraud.  And instead of being summarily dismissed, the attorney general of the states involved open investigations.  Now there’s going to be evidence presented.  If a pipe is supposed to have burst, then there’s going to be evidence that someone actually called a plumber who fixed that pipe.  If ballots are showing up people are going to investigate where they came from.  Computer experts would examine the voting machines and even publicly test them.  Now there’s at least the sense that the system is looking at the claims.  And whatever they find is publicly available.  People can look at the data on the voting machine and decide, but at minimum it’s not summary dismissal.  If you do that when Trump claims fraud, you can point to sworn testimony in court, a witness cracking on cross examination, or at least some evidence that he’s wrong.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think the legitimacy of elections is probably one of the most important things to protect in a democratic society.  If people don’t believe the election is fair, eventually it’s going to go much farther than it did in 2021.  Voting is the alternative to warfare and revolution.  And if people don’t trust the election, they won’t accept the results.  The best remedy is to take the accusations extremely seriously and do a thorough investigation, and if nothing is found, fine.  But the tactic used in 2020 of blanket dismissal, condescending comments about disinformation, and generally mocking the very idea not only didn’t reassure the public that the government was committed to fair, open, and honest elections, but often pushed people the other way.  The perception was “the government isn’t going to look at the evidence, and is going to simply label all of this as disinformation and call anyone who dares to question it a conspiracy theorist, so why should I believe it?”


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I don’t see the desire to know that the system is fair as “reactionary”.  It’s actually quite telling that we actually don’t have a reasonable way to detect fraud or secure the system.  Add in a highly unusual election where millions are voting by drop box, introducing more opportunities for fraud, and yeah people might be a bit suspicious.  I think the issues should addressed simply because until the state can demonstrate that it’s taking the problem seriously, eventually all elections will be contested simply because it cannot be demonstrated that the system has been secured.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
One thing that I think would go a very long way is taking claims of fraud seriously and taking serious steps to demonstrate that the electoral system is being run to prevent fraud.  So if I were in charge of the election system, I’d require that some sort of government issued photo ID be used.  I’d bend over backwards to make it easy (with proper source documents) to get those kinds of IDs.  Second, I’d create an organized and fair way to validate the voter rolls such that we don’t have large numbers of people on the rolls that should not be there.  Matching up names to death certificates seems like a good way to get rid of dead people on the rolls.  And I’m probably not too far off in saying that if you haven’t filed state income taxes or applied for state benefits in 3 or more years, you probably don’t live here.  If you’re required to prove citizenship to register, I think that would go pretty far to prevent illegals from voting.


The counting I think could be shown online without too much problem.  And I think doing so would be helpful because it’s a lot harder to monkey with a count that is done publicly.  And I think I’d probably also have the totals by precinct and even voting location would make it hard to inject ballots without someone noticing.  I want to make auditing easier without being able to identify who voted for whom is the goal.  I’m not sure if it would be possible to have a sort of blockchain setup that would allow people to track their own ballot from the moment they cast it until it’s officially tallied, but if it’s possible, not only would it help with building trust, but would make audits easier as you’d end up having ballots show up that were not cast anywhere.


Third, I’d take reports of anomalies seriously.  I don’t care what people think they’re seeing, but if it’s possible fraud, it deserves a full investigation.  And prosecution for fraud should be a part of that.


Do all of that, and I don’t think anyone could doubt that the election was honest.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I have accepted that Islamist ideology is the natural bent of Islamic countries.  What I do not accept is that we should allow a major portion f the globe to destabilize so they can have democracy.  The results of supporting these popular movements is basically that the region is much more unstable, much less secular, and more likely to persecute women and minorities in their own countries and launch attacks against Israel.  The result of democracy in Iraq was a radical Shia regime, not a Jeffersonian democracy.


I think any sane alien would be doing much like what I’m proposing.  If the results of our democracy were constant attacks on other planets, murder of anyone who didn’t match our ideology, and destabilizing the rest of the galaxy, these aliens would not be in favor of us having a democracy.  They’d much rather we were stable, peaceful, and under a dictatorship than that we’re attacking Alpha Centauri, killing Swedes and killing anyone who isn’t fitting in with religion.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I’ll definitely agree on the education part.  I think honestly the schools are so bad at this point that they’re meaningless.  It seems like it started with the end of the Cold War, mostly because we were moving all the factories to other parts of the world.  That triggered a crisis as now everyone needed a HS diploma and a bit more if they wanted to have anything like a working class, let alone middle class lifestyle.  And since the biggest determinant of getting a “good job” once the factory was gone was education, all barriers to education were systematically eliminated.  You can’t be so cruel as to flunk a kid who can’t do the work because if he doesn’t graduate, he’s going to live in poverty and be basically unemployed forever.  Then of course you have student loans so everyone could go to college.  Of course colleges saw this as a cash cow.  Lower the standards so that any kid who graduates high school can “earn” a diploma.


And now you have functionally uneducated college grads who believe they’re smart competent people, but aren’t and probably wouldn’t pass their grandparents freshman year of high school.  Try it.  Find math problems that a 14 year old in 1920 was expected to be able to solve and give it to a college grad in 2024.  They cannot do it.  They cannot read books that were read for fun in 1950.  Forget such arcane subjects as geography, history, or science.  It’s a scary sad thing that people with college degrees know less about science than high school kids in 1980.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
But if the mandate is to mitigate the logistics and supply issue, legibility is in fact a failure.  All of the time spent confronting groups, confiscating their supplies to audit them, and so on means failure at *the reason we bothered to create FEMA in the first place.  I think this is one of many things Neo-Reactionary thinking is correct about.  The state apparatuses are rewarded or punished and basically held to account on process and legibility rather than accomplishing the mission at hand.  And so these agencies spend much time making sure that they aren’t going to get dinged for not following the process that most agencies suck at the mission they exist to do.


I think at this point, most civilians are so done with FEMA that they’re actively trying to avoid FEMA knowing where they are and what they’re doing.  Which is a mixed bag.  Having untrained people trying to repair things or rescue people is probably a bad idea, but following the rules is likely to see supplies not get into the zone until more people die.  The loss of trust in authority is going to be hard to overcome.  Not much sympathy as they seem to be bringing it on themselves.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I think the aftermath is a complete loss.  The Arab Spring wasn’t about democracy, it was an Islamist movement based in getting rid of the old guard who were largely secular socialists and nationalists.  Our ignorance of the region and what these despots were holding back is obvious now and anyone familiar with the region and the history of could have easily told you that weakening these secular regimes is good optics and terrible policy.  And where these despots were weakened or overthrown, we now have either outright Islamist governments or powerful military junta’s threatening jihad at either the secular government or the designated target of the Jews.  But then again our midwits are not exactly scholars and were taken in by the optics that happened to coincide with their interpretation of the neo-liberal right side of history narrative that holds that humans all naturally are alike and think exactly like post-modern liberals and want nothing other than to join the Rules Based International Order and drink Starbucks and send their daughters to humanities programs at Evergreen.


To be blunt, my take on politics both domestic and international is Real Politick.  You are a fool if you’re trying to govern based on delusions and fantasies about how you wish the world works.  And you are a double fool if you’re misunderstanding human nature.  We are not fundamentally good people, no one is.  And pretending that if we just ignore reality hard enough we can wish ourselves to Utopia is just going to set everything back.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			

	


			
			
				

			
		

	






		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of October 7, 2024
			
		

	

	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Honestly, I think the same.  We’ve lost the ability to do a lot of things that our great grandparents took for granted that would just work.  I could go down the list of usual government functions and for the most part we did them better in 1924 than we do in 2024.  And I think it’s a combination of easy living, culture and poor education that’s created an elite that simply cannot handle the realities of running a complex society in the real world.