MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
No bio...
User ID: 1783
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
5d ago
I don’t know for sure how typically im skewing this, but it used to be the norm that you’d be taught to get to know tge person as an individual without regard to race. That was the color blind 1990s and 2000s. And I’d say that seems to have featured much better race relations in most cases. Certainly there were still problems, but you didn’t have any real animus between groups en mass. Now you don’t have to go very deep to find open racism, sexism, or homophobia that would not have been said aloud in the 1970s. You wouldn’t have talked openly about Jews manipulating American government, or immigrants eating pets, or black men being criminals in the Frank manner people do today. If you got in a delorean and went back to 1975 and casually mentioned that during the VP debate, JD Vance talked about immigrants eating cats, it would seem weird.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
5d ago
I think like anti-racist trainings done by HR for adults, these things might well be counterproductive. It firstly associates this group of people with essentially “struggle sessions” often humiliating, but definitely something that they are forced to do and don’t want. Secondly it creates these divisions where a class of people are essentially otherized in an attempt at inclusion. You might not have thought about gay people as different from other people, but then the teacher hangs up flags and spends hours talking about how gays are different from other people, and to the shock of absolutely no one, the kids now see the gay or trans kid as a weird alien species of human not like them. Or in the case of HR programs, you don’t start our thinking of minority coworkers as weird, you don’t say “there’s a black person in accounting” or something. Then you are forced to Notice, Affirm, and Celebrate the diversity of your workplace and told how different these black people are, and then you can’t help but see them differently.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
5d ago
I mean what comes to mind are two things done in the West. First, acting. People wear costumes. To represent the character they are portraying. Second would be fraternitie using dresses as humiliation or just as a quirky costume for a party. Those things are rare, but I don’t think it’s true that no contexts in any culture have cross dressing must be sexualizing it.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
6d ago
Most kids turned out just fine. And honestly I think it was ultimately good for us to have done those things. First of all because it taught us to self regulate behaviors and thus learn when and how to break rules with minimal danger to ourselves and others around us. Second because we’d end up getting in some level of danger either of getting caught breaking rules, or rarely physical danger, an$ would have to figure out how to get out of that mess. And finally because we learned how to get along with other kids without mom and dad to mediate. If you wanted to play one game and they want to do something else, you negotiate and figure it out.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
6d ago
I think you’d have a hard time with such a system simply because verification could be impossible. It’s perfectly legal to shoot me, im an outlaw. But what happens if you misidentified someone else as me? There are probably several million people on earth right now that look like me, so what happens next? You thought you were going to get me, who has no legal rights, but you didn’t get Maiq the True, you got Maiq the Liar. Do you go to jail? Is mistaken identity a defense? Can you be sued by next of kin? Must you return the wares?
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
6d ago
If I were queen, my hard rule would be no sexuality in school for any kid under 12. At 13 or so, obviously you need to explain sex and how babies are made. But why teach that in preschool, or even grade school when kids are not mature enough to handle it? And what make this sort of thing so important that it cannot wait for that maturity to develop.?
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
6d ago
Their lives are also ridiculously locked down. They are tracked by phone apps, social media is read, driving privileges are extremely limited (you can’t drive with more than two friends in the car until 18 under graduated licenses). The ability for kids to just go do things the way that their parents and grandparents did doesn’t exist anymore. We used to ditch school all the time, we cut class, we would go outside with other kids and the adults would not know where we were until we came home. And it was entirely possible to have friends your parents would not approve of. Kids could get drugs to school because it was easy enough for a kid to go to skid row and score some to sell at school. Safetism coupled with modern social media and phone tracking killed this type of independence.
I think this explains the mental health crisis and the no sex and drugs thing. Kids are never allowed to be alone with other kids without all the adults being privy to where they are and what they are doing. It causes a mental health crisis because kids never learn to get out of messes on their own, or to be independent. This means that kids never learn that they are capable of being independent or that problems that come up are solvable, least of all by themselves. The sex thing is because it’s impossible to get alone with a member of the opposite sex. No telling mom you’re spending the night with Mike and then going to Mary’s house. Mom will be tracking you. If you go anywhere other than Mike’s house, you’ll be in big trouble.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
7d ago
I feel the same. I’m happy with conservative Anglicans on the more traditional end of things. I can recognize other Christians even if I have disagreements in (though I have various degrees of separation depending on how far you get from the traditional understanding of Christianity and the sacraments.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
8d ago
You don’t see a problem when a man who is physically bigger and stronger can — just based on saying that he’s trans — get full access to women’s intimate spaces over the objections of the women themselves? I’m perfectly fine with doing so with a real process — requiring proof of an actual diagnosis and ongoing treatment, for example. But basically letting any man who wants to to simply walk into women’s restroom or changing room and if challenged, the magic words of “im trans” mean that not only is he allowed to do this, but women are not allowed to complain about it. So basically until such a man is seen by multiple women attempting to photograph women’s bodies, or worse attempting to rape them, there’s nothing to be done. I don’t blame such women from just not going into known “inclusive” restrooms because they are not protected.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
9d ago
If no documentation of actually being diagnosed with gender disphoria is required, then they don’t need to actually bother with the time or expense. They just go in the women’s room and if challenged, claim that they’re trans. This is rarely challenged, and in fact the few times I know of women complaining were either kicked out or shamed for transphobia.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
10d ago
There have always been pervy guys. Even Japan has to have separate cars for women on their trains. And the reason that the cameras on all phones make noise when you take a picture is because of up skirting (taking pictures under the skirts of women without them knowing). It’s a very small subset, and to my knowledge probably even rarer among true-trans people. But on the other hand, restrooms and changing are very private areas where women are vulnerable. I don’t think it’s reasonable to say “this guy just said he was a woman two minutes ago for the first time, so sorry granny, he gets to be in your changing room and see you naked.” With a process that involves time and effort, I get it.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
10d ago
I think the squeamishness is less about trans people themselves and more about the physical danger of biological males in a women’s restroom or changing room. The current state of trans is that it’s basically on the say so of the male — if a man is in the women’s restroom, he is allowed to be there unless he’s very obviously and blatantly doing something creepy. He’d basically have to openly masterbate, attempt to take pictures, or attempt a rape. Until them, all he has to do is claim to be trans — no supporting documentation required— and nobody can do anything about it. In fact, it’s much more likely that the woman who objects will face punishment for “transphobia” than tge male will.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
11d ago
It a legitimate thought experiment. I mean there’s a point at which you reach absurdity and singularity and quite often can point out the problems with the idea in question. If I can basically stick my ass through a fence and pop the baby out and it’s a citizen of the country, I think the absurdity of the idea is clear. You just can’t coherently have citizenship grant rights and not have at least some form control over who gets the benefits.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
11d ago
I think it need at minimum an establishment of residence of some sort, preferably several years. If you have to live in the country legally, pay taxes, have a residences within the country, I get that. But I just cannot logically justify the idea that I could cross the border while in labor, go to the emergency room in Brownsville TX, pop out a baby, and that baby being legally American. I’m not even sure you couldn’t push this to absurdity— like if only my Uterus enters the United States and the baby comes out at the border, is that enough to satisfy jus soli or does the entire woman have to physically cross the border for the baby to be a citizen?
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
11d ago
I’m a bit unsympathetic to the idea of people claiming US citizenship when they’ve basically always lived in another country. It’s bad faith. Your mother gamed the system by giving birth in America (jackpot! US citizenship!) but then as soon as she’s medically cleared she goes home and raises the kid as (in this case) a Mexican, doesn’t pay taxes, doesn’t teach him English or about the USA. Like, he should not be a citizen as he has no actual connection to America other than his mother crossing the border specifically to give birth, and even then could not be bothered to pay for supporting documentation. Birth tourism is not something we should allow.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
13d ago
I think I’d be marginally okay with a process that had significant time and effort to “transition”. I don’t think it reasonable to have an intact male declare on Tuesday that he feels like a woman and then get unrestricted free rein to enter any women’s spaces he likes — especially those where women would undress. But my fear is that the process once adopted will be made less strict over time — no need for surgery, then no need for hormones, then no need for medical diagnosis — until you end up with the thing the requirements were to prevent.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
13d ago
I mean the entire thing is just absolutely insane. They’re even chiding a woman who wants to clean up her digital image by deleting posts about Trump and they’re all like “no, they want to scare you into being silent! Don’t worry about it.” They think a cop “isn’t going to notice” you putting a sticker on their vest — as though there’s going to be one cop and nobody’s gonna tell him.
If I were Hispanic and thought that I might end up in a dragnet, I wouldn’t be looking to these idiots because they’d do more harm than good.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
14d ago
It also a question about how serious the people are, how likely they are to be effective in thwarting stated goals of the regime, and whether or not you can go after them without causing more harm to the regime than good. On most of these accounts, white PMC women are pretty low on the pole.
They simply are not serious about their resistance. It’s showing up to an outdoor protest theater, wearing merch and carrying signs. Then hashtaging the whole thing for views. What they are not doing? Building resistance cells. Buying weapons. Training for a fight. Hiding illegals in their homes. Practicing OPSEC and building anonymous communication channels, buying burner phones to use during protests. I can come up with dozens of effective resistance tactics that aren’t “livestream myself and all my friends at a protest” and “post I hate Trump” several times a day on social media. Second, im not seeing any move toward doing anything. The protests are a fun afternoon and I’ve seen a lot of bitching about people not having paid time off to go to these events. They’re going to get bored or run out of PTO or Theres going to be minor inconveniences (maybe they use water canons and it’s cold outside, or tear gas, or someone they know spends the night in jail) and they’re going to fade away.
Second, white PMC women tend to be married to high value men who will absolutely object to their wives being imprisoned by tge regime. They are basically walking talking hostage puppies — naturally sympathetic no matter what they’re doing. Headlines about wealthy white women getting arrested and deported is going to cause major headaches for the regime. The face of most sympathy for tge downtrodden stories are women. Mothers crying in Palestine are trotted out any time someone wants people to feel sorry for Palestinians. And Jews, not to be outdone trot out videos of women being kidnapped and raped when they want to convince you that you should support their side. Even in the USA, when you want a sob story about cutting something, there will always be a woman in the center of the story who is now struggling. They deported a Palestinian man related to high ranking figures in Hamas. But you mostly see his crying, pregnant wife.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
14d ago
It’s a problem because it’s generally the standard advice given by everybody, with no follow-up to help people actually achieve their goal weight and maintain it. Just don’t eat as much, bro. It’s not useful in getting to the goal. And since tge reason for giving weight loss advice in the first place is to help people reach a goal weight that’s appropriate for their height, advice that doesn’t lead to them getting there is a loss. Yes, any good set of weight loss advice will ultimately mean eating less, much like various budgeting plans still generally result in spending less money, and study tips generally result in people spending more time reviewing for tests. That doesn’t mean the underlying principle for those things doesn’t work, it means that you need more than the technically correct answer to make it possible to do it.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
14d ago
I mean the reason they ever went after Niemoller is that he was outspoken about his opposition to Naziism. There were millions of Germans doing normal German things throughout the 10 years of Nazi rule. Some of them might well have quietly and privately disagreed behind closed doors. The Nazis did not round up absolutely everyone who wasn’t a Nazi. They were after active dissidents, degenerates as they defined them, race mixers, etc. but it wasn’t true that any time someone said something anti-Hitler that the Gestapo would rise up through the floor and ship them off to Buchenwald. Active, ongoing dissent might get you marked. But if you keep your head down and mostly behave, your fate will be to ride out tge war and suffer only the fate of living in a country that th3 allies bombed the crap out of — which everyone suffered.
And that’s why I find the “fleeing white liberal women” so hilarious. First, as I mentioned in previous comments, they absolutely are not afraid of Trump or a fascist state. If they were, they’d certainly be careful about what they’re saying, about telling social media that they were at a protest, tagging themselves and their buddies in photos at tge protest. They’re also, other than being stupid online (again working from the belief that Trump is going to mass deport people to El Salvador, declare martial law, and cancel their social security number making life impossible) completely ineffective. It’s just insane how LARPy and performative the thing is.
As far as leaving the country, again, these spoiled little white future wine moms are not someone that any regime would worry about. Once they realize that it’s getting serious, they’re going to stop. And really, as long as they aren’t actively fighting the regime, there’s no danger. Trump doesn’t like immigrants or LGBT. He’s fine with white women.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
14d ago
Which goes back to better decisions, which is precisely what CICO by itself doesn’t do. Telling someone to just CICO is like saying “dude, just spend less than you make” with no other advice. Yes you need to sit down and budget, but you also need to understand the difference between a good purchase and a bad one, understand that rent and other bills come before entertainment in the budget, and understand how to get more bang for your buck. It’s not wrong, but from the POV of getting people to make better food decisions it’s not going to work because it’s woefully inadequate to that task. Telling someone to choose Whole Foods over crap is useful because it makes you feel full and therefore eat less. Telling someone to exercise gives them more calories to work with.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
14d ago
What has always gotten to me is the fact that (apart from their political opinions) they’d be fine even if Trump does every terrible thing they think he’s going to do. They’re white, natural born citizens, pay taxes, and do work that’s useful to the economy. The Nazis would not go after them (with the obvious exception), nor would Putin, Orbán, Duerte, or any other dictators. They’re the kind that such regimes want — educated, good jobs, pay taxes, not criminals, etc. and most of them lack the spine to seriously put themselves out there as against the regime when it stops being a fun LARP. When things get bad, they’ll shut up, scrub their socials, and for their “mental health” stop following the scary news, let alone do anything. Those that intend to fight are doing it stupidly with zero thought to opsec or grey man that it’s would be relatively easy to comb through socials and pick them up before doing anything serious.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
15d ago
The principal works. The problem I see with CICO is that it’s kinda like telling a drug addict that they just need to not do drugs. It’s true, the best thing a drug addict can do is not do drugs, but the advice if that is as far as it goes is precisely useless because it does tell people how to actually stop using the drugs. Better advice would include changing your routines and habits to avoid triggers and easy access to drugs, and finding things to do that fill your days with happiness without the drugs.
Food wise, the advice, in my view is to eat Whole Foods, unprocessed foods, favoring plants and protein, and limiting carbs especially simple carbs. Then you add in some exercise especially muscle building exercises though even walking has benefits.
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
15d ago
They sent him to a prison they didn’t let him off at the airport. That isn’t just “conditions he didn’t like”, again this is a prison. And furthermore, this is at the behest of our government, and as such, the argument that “whelp, he’s in another country now, so despite the judge saying he gets a hearing and ordering us to return him, there’s nothing we can do.”
Until they get sick of riding in urine soaked public transit with drug addicted homeless people. I mean there’s a reason why no one wants to ride public transit and it ain’t the cost. My city has voted on expanding it all the time no one wants it.. They don’t want the crime, the drugs, the smell.
More options
Context Copy link