site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 24, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

20
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are there other quotes, or is this in reference to her response to not wanting the national anthem played at WNBA games as a protest in the wake of Breonna Taylor’s death?

"I honestly feel we should not play the National Anthem during our season," said Griner. "I think we should take that much of a stand.

"I don't mean that in any disrespect to our country. My dad was in Vietnam and a law officer for 30 years. I wanted to be a cop before basketball. I do have pride for my country."

I know some in conservative media made a meal of the above, certainly. But in line with being charitable when discussing things, is this “going off about how terrible the US is”, or are there some quotes I’m missing?

There has been a lot of discussion around Griner’s detention, and it’s served as a focal point of the culture war.

It’s paywalled, but Ethan Strauss had an excellent piece on how other, not-Griner, athletes — as well as people in the media — have been off-putting in their framing of the topic…

https://houseofstrauss.substack.com/p/how-athletes-repel-the-public-on

…where it becomes a proxy for a lack of respect for (lesbians/blacks/women) as opposed to framing it as disproportionate punishment handed out to a U.S. citizen. And also framing athletes as above the average citizen. Which, in my opinion, is all spot-on in terms of things that will cause much of the public to roll their eyes.

People who diss the US usually add disclaimers about how they're not really dissing the US. Remember everyone claiming "we support our troops"?

Opposing the national anthem is a blunt instrument that sends a message about the USA in general. And claiming that your message is not meant to communicate what, among everyone else, it would be meant to communicate, is just dishonest. Meanings aren't something you can rewrite on your own.

And I'm skeptical, anyway, that someone who sends a broad message and adds "I don't really mean this broad message" is sincere about it, rather than just going for plausible deniability.

And I'm skeptical, anyway, that someone who sends a broad message and adds "I don't really mean this broad message" is sincere about it, rather than just going for plausible deniability.

Someone recommended this forum, but man is it a disappointment. Top of this thead is don’t put words in people’s mouths. You’re not a mind reader, and Griner was plain about her views of the country as a whole. Unless, again, there’s some other statement of hers, which I fully leave open the possibility.

  • -21

Someone recommended this forum, but man is it a disappointment.

Please don't do this. You're arguing with an individual on a forum specifically open to working out weird and often wrong theories. If the poster's theory is bad attack the theory, not the forum. There's no promise on the op that every argument you run into is a winner.

Don’t worry, this is my last post here. There’s little buy in to the terms, and it’s not just that poster.

  • -18

That’s rather tangential to Griner, but yes, I do.

And I also remember how things like being against undertaking a war of nation building in a mountainous, tribal backwater of a country already known as “the Graveyard of Empires” was spun to be an attack on the troops. Even if you thought the government should stop paying private contractors more than they pay the troops, increase troop pay, fix and adequately fund the VA, and demand politicians not make arrogant and stupid plans that get troops killed, while noting that the supermajority of our servicemen bore no blame in the military failures of the last 20 years. I one-hundred percent remember people trying to conflate criticism of politicians with criticism of the troops for very cynical reasons.

And I do remember the impulse to add a disclaimer that we do, in fact, support our troops, because of the above.