This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The assumption that this is a starkly gender divided issues always struck me as strange. The most extreme pro-life people I've met, and I was raised catholic with plenty of outside of mass church crowd interactions, have always been women. Now maybe women are just more hot on the subject on both sides and women skew democrat while men skew republican so there could be a gender skew just from that but there are definitely rabidly pro-life women that these ads could be trying to reach.
At least in polling, it's been pretty consistent since the 60's or 70's that the percent of men/women for/against abortion have been pretty close. In the most recent polling from Pew women are 5% more likely to be pro-choice/5% less likely to be pro-lifr, but this has fluctuated over the years/depending on the poll and has even been reversed at times.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/#h-views-on-abortion-by-gender-2022
More options
Context Copy link
Not when you consider that the chief rhetorical tactic of the side that has cultural hegemony is to insist that being anti-abortion is a male predilection (tied to power or some more malicious patriarchal goal).
Hear it enough and it has an impact.
It seems strange to me that people with access to good quality polling take their own medicine on the idea.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
From the discussions of long-term polling I've seen, this is right. There's not much of a split between men and women on the object level issue--women are slightly more pro-abortion than men, but only slightly--but there is a measurable intensity difference. Women are more likely to land in the "strongly [pro-/anti-] abortion" category than men.
(I think this might be a polling artifact, though. One of the major cultural arguments made is "this is a women's issue; men should sit in a corner," and it's plausible that would impact expressed-intensity to pollsters.)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link