This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This hits the nail on the head for me. People attack crypto for being volatile, prone to hacks, scams and so on.
But at the end of the day, digital currency is not going away. Cash is going away - it's inconvenient. We are not switching back to gold. There is a binary choice between a central bank digital 'currency' and a decentralized digital currency, almost certainly a cryptocurrency.
The former is controlled by bankers and governments, it literally just becomes good boy points that can be doled out or withdrawn at will. Freedom of transaction is the fundamental basis for every other kind of freedom. Good luck with your free speech if you can't even pay for food, let alone a marker and cardboard. First it's CP and loli or whatever, then it's anything they don't like. Disfavoured groups are already systematically disadvantaged in uni admissions, job applications and certain grant initiatives. Why not raise taxes on them or raise prices of certain goods for certain people? What about a climate lockdown? This power is seductive and self-reinforcing. It is very effective at suppressing people. AI-assisted control of centralized digital currency is the totalitarian dream. They can print money and ration goods with perfect efficiency. They can assess taxes at will, arbitrarily. Paypal decided to sneak back in its $2500 arbitrary fine after pretending to scrap it - there is nothing and nobody that can stop them if they're acting at the will of the state.
The latter is controlled by stakers, miners and eccentric nerds. Maybe they make mistakes from time to time. But they don't have armies and fleets, they don't have vast bureaucracies to inflict their will on the rest of us. The rules are fairer - all transactions are public (or in the case of Monero all are private). There is no panopticon for thee and privacy for me. Reputable coins don't have a single node that can print unlimited amounts of currency for free - looking at you central banks.
More options
Context Copy link