This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well, great job incarcerating a vanishingly small percentage of the people you want incarcerated. It still changes not much. (You may note that even the process you participated in generally requires a prior conviction for an actual offense, not mere attraction, so you certainly didn't get to live up to your own daydreams.)
It's all still a small blip on the historical radar. Maybe I'll give you credit as a trailblazer if in 500 years people are still clutching their pearls about men being inevitably sexually attracted to a nice pair of 13 year old tits or a plump, tight 12 year old ass, but a quick look around TikTok pretty much proves that the dam of social disapproval on that subject probably can't hold forever. For decades more probably, yes, especially since we're still in the age of cancellation terror. But natural desire usually tends to win in the long run. You can brutalize Mother Nature, but nobody's killed her yet.
I'll give you the credit of assuming that you know how massive of a selection bias this is.
We never used Mastercard lad.
I never said there was any organization. There's not. In the event your harebrained scheme was ever widely implemented, most of the people ending up on my side (including quite likely you eventually, again assuming it were universal/honest and not an arbitrary grift which it probably would be) would be horrified by it. Many would probably convince themselves that they weren't actually on it and the machines had made a big mistake, and that's why they were fighting back (and this narrative might be what would let the whole thing be shut down or downsized to sanity while allowing the regime to save face). But if they were facing imprisonment, they wouldn't have much of a choice.
It's not a "violent pedo fantasy". Violent is being such a dedicated, self-denying stooge for feminist agecuckoldry that you idly fantasize about incarcerating vast swathes of the population for nearly universal sexual inclinations. Saying "Wow if you did that then you'd have a really big, aggressive problem on your hands." in response is just basic logic.
Dial down the antagonism. You're taking a highly contentious position and so unsurprisingly you are taking some heat, and I'll cut you some slack for that, but you still need to respond to people civilly and without rancor.
I appreciate your treatment of me as perhaps the ultimate Olmec.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link