site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 5, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

having some sort of violent struggle would have, uh, not improved race relations.

There was a violent struggle. Southern white supremacists attempted to suppress the civil rights movement by force until the federal government stepped in and made them stop.

They failed. There was the 101st airborne, yes, but the majority of the south saw no federal troops deployed. The KKK burned crosses and it didn’t work.

What you didn’t see was mass black terrorism. It wasn’t a thing.

What you didn’t see was mass black terrorism. It wasn’t a thing.

History didn’t end up going that way, partially because the federal government finally put its foot down, but the first five years of the civil rights era and the first five years of the Troubles in Northern Ireland are almost beat for beat the same. You even had American equivalents of Republican and Unionist paramilitary groups forming. The main difference is that in Ireland the military rolled in to protect the old social order, not to impose the new one.

There’s a saying in war colleges that you don’t notice the successful counter insurgencies, because the successful ones deflate the causes of the insurgency before it breaks out into mass violence. The civil rights era was a successful counter-insurgency. And I think had the situation been handled differently by the federal government it could have very well exploded into a 30 year long bleeding ulcer like Northern Ireland did.