site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 12, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think that's quite the same, though: that just seems like normal low-commitment behavior to me (including the "what am I doing with my life?" piece every so often), cycling through hobbies once you've exhausted them. Not that this problem can't look like that, though (and it's a good first pass for normal people).

Most of the people I know (including the one you just described) like this are high-commitment for hobbies, people, etc. and actually try to make things work (scarcity/survive mindset?), so this doesn't fit. When I stop being able to consider working on something, or hanging out with people, it's not caused by that- it's something very different than "too hard, bored now", and to a point what I believe the 'depression' mechanism is supposed to protect us from (the "stop giving it your best, don't even look at that, save your energy for other opportunities"). It is probably functioning normally in this instance, but what's prompting it to occur is not.

[That first pass applied thoughtlessly is usually net-negative for us; from our standpoint, we're being clear and honest about how we work and that first pass signals you just aren't paying attention. I can see going to therapy/counseling being like this, which means it can be of limited effectiveness if you're running through the "troubleshoot a normal human being" checklist.]

and they aren't really considering the impact on others when they do it.

We over-consider it, because we're running the "functional/aligned-in-the-AI-sense human being" program in high-level emulation rather than letting the hardware model other people for us (the normal way). It takes a lot more energy to do this.

After that, it's down to personality. Some of us are real assholes about that and make that everyone else's problem by complaining about absurd nonsense; others keep it to ourselves.