This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Since liberalism/politics serves the economic end/capitalism I would focus more on the economic benefits of convincing a set of women that working for their family was being tyrannized while pouring your life into whatever endeavor some business owner had was, in fact, freedom.
But the end is the same. The atomized woman's energies can be redirected.
Given the rise of #MeToo I would argue that feminism functions to actually make it hard to discard these women at your whim. That's a quick way to an unfalsifiable accusation of "misconduct" - that dreadfully vague word that now encompasses everything from being a Victorian-era cad (who had sex with women by promising commitment he had no intention of providing) to an actual serial rapist like Weinstein.
This is why I think the benefit to elite men is oversold. Feminism is primarily a means for middle class and above women to compete with men of their economic class. That involves elite men; those attempts to "diversify the boardroom" have to throw some old white male overboard.
Yes, the majority of people being so killed are middle-class and upper-middle class men with seniority (that NYT reporter who got canned for saying the wrong thing on a trip with woke elite teenagers is the prototype) but they do get men who are higher up too.
More options
Context Copy link