site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 5, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If Musk has evidence Baker acted badly (which I already said is perfectly plausible) there's nothing stopping him from showing it. He's not showing it. I don't think it's unreasonable for me to withhold judgment and not take Musk at his word when he's being so vague and cagey.

Which part of the above exactly do you take issue with?

I don't see how my retweets of what other people said are relevant. If you have an objection to something I myself actually wrote then just make your argument about what I actually wrote. No need to play offense archeology across other platforms, it's not like anyone can accuse me of being too terse to quote.

Because it makes it look like you go for partisan consensus enforcement when you think you can get away with it. When you can't, you fall back on what's carefully crafted to look like objective analysis with the partisanship hidden to muddy the waters as much as possible.

Like I said, it's a lawyerly debating method.

And I wasn't playing archeology: Singal retweeted you a few hours after I made that post, and I saw your account.

"You retweeted something I think is a partisan screed" is not an argument. You can continue scrying the tea leaves or you can actually address what I, myself, actually wrote and argued. I already laid out my position above and you've side-stepped addressing it. So once again:

Which part of the above exactly do you take issue with?