This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Because its just another piece of evidence that there is a totaltarian (alwayd bad), authoritarian (sometimes bad, sometimes good), state -corporate collusion that shuts down debate, reason, exchange of evidence, and truthseeking in general. It appears that mass mob behaviours are encouraged, and that this system appears to select not for the health and prosperity of the people (like any good ol' fashioned good fascism***), but only for some highly individualistic lifestyle options and personal profits for a very small elite, as well as for the profusion of greater totalitarianism and refusals to discuss or accept compromise in society.
That twitter has recently demonstrated that resistance to this totalitarian state-corporate partnership requires that one be as rich and well connected as Elon Musk, on again off again worlds richest man, just highlights how, well, total the intolerant totalitarian regime is behind the facade.
I am not a billionaire, There are no options I think can guinely and effectively take to resist this regime as it appears to have fully co-opted discourse, debate, the
scientific process/establishment, elections and democracy, and markets. Or at least is capable of doing so ad-hoc if it is required to crush dissent or even honest debate and confusion.
Focusing on it as twitter as a tech company is the wrong layer of abstraction to correctly model what is apparently going on here, and in wider western society.
*** This is a joke, I may have some opinions that could be described as faschist by a Guardian article in the year of our lord 2022, but positive endorsement of good ol fashioned fascisms love for the Volk is 100% meant as tongue pressed firmly through the cheek and off 20 lightyears into space.
The solution to wokists co-opting and subverting the public square of the future is to set down regulations that push both sides to be treated equally. Democracies can have problems with pushing sides towards truth-seeking due to human nature, but using this as an argument to abandon democracy is farcical when dictatorships almost universally have a worse track record on this front.
No, that has been proven to not work. If treating "both sides" equally worked then wokists would not have been able to co opt and subvert not just the public square but the entire edifice of western civilisation. You cannot persuade me that something already empirically proven to be a failure will work a second time, just because of a slight change to the magic words that dictate how people are supposed to behave.
Dictatorship or monarchism having a worse track record over all is debatable and yet also utterly irrelevant, as long as it is better for me and mine. This is the lesson wokism teaches, and it teaches it well.
If you join the party early, you can indeed reap great benefits in dictatorship.
The same if you manage to get near the king and lick his boots hard enough to be promoted to nobility. Just work hard, trust in yourself and you will make it.
Party has already started, but if the best time to finish work and show up was 70 years ago, the second best time is now.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link