site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 19, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

16
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, you are wrong. Ancillary justice is great.

To address a few of your points:

The AIs don't "need" to take over humans, they do it to create perfect AI controlled meat puppet servants for the officer cadres aboard the ships, as non human servants is just low class.

The AI human main character is just a fragment of the actual AI, and due to having loads of bits of brain scooped out to fit in the cyberaugmetics for communication and integration with the AI is basically a weird techno autist. The AI was also not a god AI like a culture mind. What is left is essentially a fusion of a small part of the AI fused with the lobotomised remnants of the original human.

They all use she pronouns not as an endorsement of woke, but as their culture is a slave owning, world conquering, plantation building, mass murdering, genocidal, xenophobic, feudal caste based imperium of polite nazis in space who like to drink tea and wear fine clothes (edit I forgot the end of this bit, so they use one pronoun for eveyone as that is their culture and they literally force it on everyone else, who doesn't get slave lobotomised or killed in their invasiom that is). The language fuckups are the shattered remnants of the AI and lobotomised human autistically struggling to not to act like they have done for their whole life, that is like a conquering army backed up by reams of orbital dakka, ready to genocide the natives if they don't like how things are done now.

It is to my read a praise of autocratic caste based society, while also holding up a dark mirror on how the elements of a woke worldview (pronouns) are intrinsically alienating to humans and flow only from a conquering army backed by the righteousness power of the gun barrel and little else, while being natural only to literal autistic meat puppets lobotomised to act as servants for their caste betters. It is easy to view it as an extreme criticism of wokeness.

The AIs don't "need" to take over humans, they do it to create perfect AI controlled meat puppet servants for the officer cadres aboard the ships, as non human servants is just low class.

The AI human main character is just a fragment of the actual AI, and due to having loads of bits of brain scooped out to fit in the cyberaugmetics for communication and integration with the AI is basically a weird techno autist.

This is basically what I assumed the author was trying to get at - but the beginning was far too slow paced and uninteresting to keep me hooked until this was made explicit. I think she either needed to hook people earlier, or address this explicitly. As I've mentioned elsewhere though I had too much heat in this post and not enough light.