site banner
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think this is just a disagreement of semantics: you and he are using slightly different definitions for the word "lie". You are using it to include any form of dishonesty, or at least the forms the media uses, while Scott is using it to mean literal false statements of fact which are objectively disprovable.

you and he are using slightly different definitions for the word "lie".

Yes, and as per my initial comment, it'd be nice if he had explicitly laid out his definition of 'lie.'

That's the missing context I'd really like to be added in.