site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 2, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

10
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd say its largely due to regulation and union issues but that's a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Would you develop really efficient port-technology if it was bureaucratically impossible? It only makes sense to make the tech really well if you can profit from its implementation. Yes, there are automated ports in Europe, they did invent the tech. But the Asian ports are the best at using it now, as with HSR. The US is particularly bad at these things, HSR and ports.

Having a capable government/planning system/labor market is just as important as having technological capacity. Organization of people is a kind of technology, just like organization of matter. People talk about the Chinese working on 'Chinese time' where they get things done quickly.

What does a technological issue even mean in a globalized world? A shortage of money to buy the thing you need? Inability to train/pay engineers that are needed to maintain it? Not having the industrial capacity to cost-effectively produce it at scale? Not having connurbations of know-how that allow quick manufacturing and iteration? Not having laws that allow it?

Not knowing how to make the necessary widget is maybe relevant for semiconductors, AI and missiles but everything else is human factors like organization, political priorities and wealth.

I bet this article would be really useful but it's dead: https://www.joc.com/article/us-ports-no-rush-follow-shanghai-automation-path_20171211.html