This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Obviously a court ruling is an example of a bureaucracy implementing a policy. There's an official paper trail there.
Of course they weren't, and there is a huge amount of documentary evidence for budgeting, planning, and orders pertaining to the camp system itself. But there isn't any reference to some top-secret extermination operation or the planning or construction of homicidal gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. The problem is not that there is a lack of documentation pertaining to the camp system, there's an ENORMOUS body of documentation pertaining to the most minute details and planning of the camp systems, with the very stark omission being any reference whatsoever to a top-secret extermination program
Do you know how difficult it is to cremate i.e. 800,000 bodies in the matter of ~120 days? It was something like 6,000 people allegedly cremated on makeshift open-air pyres in Treblinka every single day without fail, rain or shine. That is an impossible operation, one that could not possibly have evaded planning and budgeting for the immense resources required for the task. The mainstream historians simply nave no explanation for where the camps, for example, procured the immense amount of fuel which would have been required for the cremation operation. Of course there's no documentary trace for any planning or budgeting for the bare necessities required to run the operation. It's just left without explanation- an operation of this magnitude could not have escaped substantial amounts of planning.
The British intercepted and decoded all communication between Auschwitz and SS command during the height of the "Holocuast". The communications contain not an iota of reference or mere allusion to any extermination operation. They do contain explicit orders from command to reduce the high death toll caused by epidemic typhus "at any cost" in order to maintain a productive workforce which was important for the war effort. The sheer lack of reference to the operation in documents, planning, and communication is a big problem for the mainstream theory and not something that can be hand-waved with "it was planned through an incredible meeting of minds." Incredible indeed.
More options
Context Copy link