This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
At the height of the violence, support for "reasonable" violence peaked at 22%. Without looking I'd be willing to bet fewer than 10% of congressmen endorsed violence at that time. Would also bet that the majority decried it when asked.
Claims that majorities genuinely want, will want, or recently wanted riots, violence, arson, looting, and violent criminals released by lunchtime does not comport with the data. Its an irrational belief in total contradiction to the lives claim they want.
To jump into this discussion, I suspect that polls are hopelessly tenuously-connected with the on-the-ground reality. The modal American may be for peaceful protest and strong policing, but when push comes to shove and your neighborhood is caught up in the latest outrage, those 77-plus-percenters are not going to physically manifest into your city and say to the fire-starters "no, stop that, bad! We do not support this, this is not who we are!"
I've talked about this before, the idea that unpopular things can still exist and have power. Favorable polling numbers mean nothing if the implied consequence does not follow. For all I know, 77% is nowhere near enough to be a consensus, maybe you'd need to be chasing nines for "public support" to actually mean something. The numbers you quoted way above leave a staggering 23-17% of people that disagree about peaceful protest.
More options
Context Copy link
...Which is why the media, elected officials, and the Blue social consensus machine generally actively worked to conceal the scale of the violence, and suppressed anyone who tried to do otherwise. Perhaps you recall the "mostly peaceful protest" meme? The claim, which at least half of the public appears to have bought, was that violence was sporadic and isolated, and that claims to the contrary were misinformation generated by racists and other bad people.
On the other hand, I claim that roughly half the country at minimum will tolerate riots, violence, arson, looting and violent criminals released by lunchtime, as long as it's properly presented to them by the consensus machine. I claim this because I saw it happen.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link