This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It seems odd that if PV is such a deceptive media organization, they consistently release the raw footage of their stories.
This is so completely unlike any other media organization, in the direction of transparency and, like, not being misleading that your criticism of the fact that they are implying something without directly misquoting the subject seems a bit misplaced. Don't you think it's pretty likely that all the other media organizations are doing that too, you just don't know about it because they don't release the unedited footage?
If you are going to discount stuff from PV because of their "track record of deceptive stories" or whatever, don't you think the bar needs to be a bit higher than "presents a bite-sized story which flatters the (presumed) bias of their audience while releasing unedited transcripts at the same time"?
Like, this shit happened -- the NPR guy said what he said, and so did the Pfizer guy. PV didn't make anything up -- perhaps the sources themselves are unreliable, but at least we can evaluate the credibility of the sources. Unlike when the NYT quotes "sources close to Trump" (or "high up in the Republican party", etc) about basically anything.
I think releasing unedited footage should definitely happen more, and I already acknowledge this is a routine problem in other media outlets. The Katie Couric 'Under the Gun' example is the one that pissed me off the most, and this one from MSNBC trying their damndest not to let the audience know the guy openly-carrying an AR-15 outside of an Obama rally was black is probably the all-time most acrobatic example I can think of.
But Veritas has not been consistent with releasing unedited footage. I note this example above but when Wisconsin's GOP attorney general asked for the full unedited tapes of a Democrat operating talking about planning voter fraud, O'Keefe claimed to have complied but only provided edited segments (see pages 5 and 10 in their case report). I can understand being cagey about releasing unedited footage to the public at large, but can't think of a legitimate reason O'Keefe would withhold information from law enforcement (O'Keefe's excuses about not including parking lot portions etc are just not credible given his past videos).
[BTW to your credit @jfk, I previously believed that Veritas has not released any unedited footage since 2011. You pointed out enough examples to poke holes in that broad statement.]
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link