This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't think it was an improvement to replace the sexism and entitlement of men with the sexism and entitlement of women.
Compare: the popular conception of racism is "saying [slur] to people of [race]" rather than what racism actually is, which is the hatred of anything associated with that race.
And for the most part that hatred actually makes some amount of sense; that's ultimately how it's laundered. No, wishing the boys in your care acted more like [your favorite stereotype of] girls, and punishing them if they don't act like it, is not guaranteed to be hatred of those boys, but it's functionally indistinguishable from it, even if you can come up with some justification for why forcing boys to act like girls is better. (You'll notice this is how the wokes define "hatred"; their only problem is that they're selfish pricks that think this is everyone else's problem but theirs and take steps to define themselves out of ever being convicted of it- a classic conservative/right-wing-style move. Men are correct in pointing out that the academic and managerial tracks for women are where a significant cluster of these people reside; quite literally the "old girls' club".)
X-ism is, in a meritocratic/mercantile/worth-of-a-[hu]man-defined-by-the-service-they-provide-others/Christian? society, a crime of the heart because it's an abject refusal to find value being left on the table for [one or more of the 3 missing "conservative" moral foundations] reasons; but being a crime of the heart is why it's so difficult to deal with. That was what the standards-based/meritocratic regime of yesteryear(s) was supposed to avoid, but no plan like that has ever survived economic contraction. That's why modern gynosupremacists take pains to pretend this is still the way the system works, after all.
But it takes, like, effort to do that.
More options
Context Copy link