site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 3, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't now what to tell you, dawg.

Women surpassed men in college enrollment sometime in the 80's.

Since then they've racked up more student debt than the men.

Which isn't surprising because they choose degrees that pay less.

And once they've graduated they have far heightened standards for potential mates.

So we have multiple pressures against women settling down with a 'good' man all stemming from the same place.

Which ends with them hitting middle age and lamenting the lack of options.

In sum, many women spend four years or so getting a degree they'll barely use, taking on debt they won't pay back anytime soon, have their personal standards raised too high to accept a partner, and get VERY VERY upset when life doesn't turn out the way they wanted on the back end of that.

And all of that might be not be notable if it weren't for the fact that the women themselves have just become less content with their status. What does it mean when you give a group of people MORE concessions and they express greater displeasure?

Good luck finding an upside in all that. I don't even have to bring up the TFR issue to make this point, but the correlation obviously exists. Hard to see how this has contributed to human flourishing.

At some point the critics look like they have a real, correct argument.


Make whatever value judgment of the situation you like, the stats say what they say, and it supports the view that sending women to college en masse has made them LESS likely to end up satisfied with their life than otherwise.

I don't find these driveby attempts at derision bothersome at all, but I do find the complete inability to engage with the accurate observation of the facts on the ground to be... suspicious.

The "becoming less content with their status" thing starts a long downtrend from 2007... the year the iPhone was released.

I don't want to say it's overexposure to social media and suddenly being able to compare yourself to millions of other women, but it might be.