This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I mean the post I responded to is just a "waaah why do you care" post, not some bold challenge he should feel bad about shirking. It's not even hard to answer. Over-representation in hostile/degenerate institutions and industries, and really outrageously overt meddling in American politics on behalf of their pet ethnostate, boom done. If any other country tried pulling shit like getting BDS laws passed in the US there would be calls to bomb them.
I mean I think Israel is a good idea and most of what they do wrong is forced on them by their adversaries. Add that to not me blaming Jews anymore than any other white group arguing for anti-white policies and then you have me going "I don't get it."
And I don't!
As I'm sure others don't get my distaste taste for low class urban black culture.
And Jew haters really fucking hate Jews. Many do so more than the a guy who watched an illegal Mexican run over his neighbors kid.
It should take more than "those guys are in the academic institutions with the wokeness!!!!" to generate that much anger/hate/distaste.
A few somewhat relevant thoughts I had just now:
Dishonest individuals and groups (that would be most of them) tend to hate those whom they have already harmed. The violence may come first (started for a variety of reasons including opportunism or simple peer pressure or whatever else) and then the mind will rationalize the aggression, which is one of the human brain's specialties. "I'm good, so if I harmed someone, they must be bad. Ergo I should try to defeat them fully rather than atone, lest they, almost surely being evil and such, harm me in return". This may be especially true when the abusers have not overwhelmingly been forced to admit wrongs and apologize or make reparations. See: Germany after WW2 versus the stubbornly jingoistic Turks who even today will mostly try to blame the Armenians and Greeks for the crime of being genocided, ratherthan admit the historicity or evils of the events.
Antisemitism and the scapegoating, abuse and killing of Jews was so central to Nazism's growth and recreation that to renounce the antisemitism would be to admit that the group whom Neo-Nazi wretches sympathize with or descend from was indeed completely wrong to do what they did. It would be mentally difficult to both fully admit the reality of and condemn the Holocaust while supporting everything else the Nazis stood for.
Why Jews, in particular? They are a very small group. People tend to direct and unleash abuse and violence against those who are small or less able or less willing to defend themselves. The Jews were deemed both small and dangerous due to their high IQs and money and political activity. To be both vulnerable and potentially dangerous is a potent mixture for motivating destruction. The nazis also had genocidal plans against the Slavs of Eastern Europe, whom they viewed as being very low in the racial hierarchy, but deemed it more important to kill the Jews first. The Palestinians also try to claim that the Jews are a tiny pest, but a very dangerous pest. The average Gazan believed that only around half a million Jews lived in Israel, prior to October 7th. This lets the ignorant person believe that it's both important and fully doable to wipe them out once and for all.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link