site banner
PaperclipPerfector  13hr ago (text post)   462 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for November 28, 2025

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There are many words in the English language which are formed using a prefix or a suffix, but for which the antonym formed by removing that prefix or suffix (or using the opposite prefix or suffix) is never used. There are even a handful of cases in which two compound words can be formed using a prefix and its antonymic prefix, but the word itself is never used in isolation, or has a vastly different meaning than would be inferred based on the meaning of the two compound words. Some examples:

  • abuse, v. (antonym: disabuse): to affirm that another's belief is correct and not a misconception
  • appointment, n. (antonym: disappointment): the state of feeling satisfied
  • baseful, adj. (antonym: baseless): (of claims) with sound evidentiary backings
  • concerting, adj. (antonym: disconcerting): tending to cause ease and comfort
  • faultful, adj. (antonym: faultless): containing many imperfections
  • feckful, adj. (antonym: feckless): purposeful, competent, effective
  • gormful, adj. (antonym: gormless): sharp; intelligent; with his wits about him
  • gruntled, adj. (antonym: disgruntled): content, satisfied
  • gutful, adj. (antonym: gutless): brave, courageous
  • hatful, adj. (antonym: hatless): the state of wearing a hat
  • homeful, adj. (antonym: homeless): of a fixed abode
  • inotic, adj. (antonym: exotic): indigenous, native
  • interminate, v (antonym: exterminate): to commit mass suicide à la Jonestown
  • interpret1, v. (antonym: misinterpret): to understand correctly and accurately
  • jointed, adj. (antonym: disjointed): connected, coherent.
  • parage, v. (antonym: disparage): to commend or praise.
  • peerful, adj. (antonym: peerless): (of individuals) with many equals
  • pitiful, adj.2 (antonym: pitiless): empathetic, caring
  • rate, v.3 (antonyms: overrate, underrate): to assess the value of accurately
  • react, v.4 (antonyms: overreact, underreact): to respond in an appropriate fashion
  • reckful, adj. (antonym: reckless): cautious, careful
  • ruthful, adj. (antonym: ruthless): scrupulous
  • seamful, adj. (antonym: seamless): amateurishly put together
  • spotful, adj. (antonym: spotless): dirty, disheveled
  • substar, n. 5 (antonym: superstar): a minor celebrity; a B-, C- or Z-lister
  • subvise, v. (antonym: supervise): to oversee ineffectually
  • superstandard, adj. (antonym: substandard): in excess of requirements, superior
  • timeful, adj. (antonym: timeless): bound to a particular era, a product of its time; an unintentional period piece
  • tireful, adj. (antonym: tireless): prone to exhaustion, easily worn out
  • topful, adj. (antonym: topless): decently clad
  • underdose, n. v. (antonym: overdose): an insufficent dose
  • underdraft, n. (antonym: overdraft): a positive bank balance
  • underkill, n. (antonym: overkill): to use methods insufficient to accomplish one's goal
  • undersee, v. (antonym: oversee): to supervise ineffectually; to ignore or forget about
  • understay, v. (antonym: overstay): to cut one's residence short
  • undertake, v.6 (antonym: overtake): to be overtaken by sb
  • whelm, v. (antonyms: overwhelm, underwhelm): just the right amount, neither surplus nor insufficient to requirements
  • witful, adj. (antonym: witless): intelligent, sensible

Can you think of any other good examples?

1 Obviously this word does see use on some occasions, and yet it isn't strictly an antonym for "misinterpret": "misinterpret" specifically denotes an inaccurate interpretation, whereas "interpret" is equivocal on whether the interpretation was accurate or not.

2 We move here into the realm of pedantry, as while this word does see use, it's not used as an antonym of "pitiless": rather, it denotes someone deserving of pity, which is more properly denoted by "pitiable". See also "nauseous"/"nauseated". In other cases people get this distinction right e.g. "contemptuous"/"contemptible".

3 See also "interpret": unlike "to overrate" and "to underrate", "to rate" does not pass judgement on whether the assessment was a fair or accurate one. Confusingly, "to rate" also carries a colloquial meaning of "to think highly of, to commend"; when Roy Keane said of Mick McCarthy, "... I didn't rate you as a player, I don't rate you as a manager, and I don't rate you as a person..." he meant that he didn't think highly of him in any of these capacities. This runs contrary to the word's usual meaning of "to assess", which includes both positive and negative assessments.

4 See also "rate".

5 There was a British comedian (it might have been Lee Evans) who once quipped that every actor who appears in a porn film is denoted a porn star, which is not the standard we apply to actors in general, only a minority of whom can be called "stars". "Where are all the porn actors?"

6 As distinct of its meaning "to undertake a task".

"Rate" seems to me like it is indeed used as you describe. Someone's accoplishments can "rate", or properly deserve, praise. A work of art can be "rated highly". There are plenty of industries in which saying that someone's job is to rate, or grade or assess, quality or purity would be perfectly logical.

I believe that "rueful" is both the true antonym for "ruthless" (not scrupulous) and actually a word for which the suffix change is fairly normal. Not sure why this one is slightly irregular... "faithful" exists, as does "shoeless", so the problem would appear to be with "ruthless". Perhaps "rueless" is just too wimpy a collection of sounds for this idea.

For abuse, I have always thought of it being the opposite of disabuse in that an abused person's thought process, etc, is being abused by incorrect notions. Thus, to disabuse is to free someone from a figurative abuser.

A fun example to add to the list (possibly) is inchoate, which means not fully formed. Apparently, lawyers do use the implied antonym choate, but Scalia has long criticized this because the "in" here is not in fact a negative prefix, so creating the implied antonym is nonsenical. Personally, I have always thought of coalesced as a good opposite. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/law_dictionaries_accept_choate_although_scalia_has_long_disagreed

There is an archaic noun "(ruth)[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ruth])", which seems to mean the same thing as "rue". Many centuries ago it was a commonplace for Christian parents to name their children after Christian virtues they want them to embody, which is where the name "Ruth" came from: along with "Grace" it's the only such name which has really stuck around in Ireland. Some of these like "Hope" are more common in the states, and you'll sometimes encounter Nigerians called "Goodluck" ("Chastity" only gets used ironically by sex workers).

Good point on the Biblical Ruth, but that is supposed to mean friendship or friend, right? I think "ruthless" has to be a slant of "rue-less". Surely we dont have people out there naming their kids "Regret" as a desired virtue! (Well, actually maybe Hunger Games fans...)

Regret is a name, Sergeant. The name of one of the Covenant's religious leaders. A Prophet.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats