This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Helps to have the post in front you. Also... man, I don't know how to say this, but having family in literally the exact same position as Rob Reiner, it's hard to describe the causal link unless you've seen it. In fact, seeing this headline deeply upset my wife, it parallels so closely with the situation my in-laws perpetually put themselves in with their own mentally ill, drug addicted, violent felon of a son.
Now you might ask, fairly, "What does this have to do with TDS?" And it's a tough explainer, except to say, their TDS is so enmeshed in every decision of their entire lives, and it sucks up so much of their mental space, that somehow they've developed a blind spot to this family member who is obviously going to murder them that they allow to live with them. There are no problems in the world that they can perceive unless they reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. No matter how many people tell them "Hey, your son is going to murder you", no matter how many police wellness checks their neighbors call in on them because their son is in the backyard acting like he might murder someone, no matter how many people refuse to go to their house anymore because they are living with someone who constantly talks about murdering people in a manic state, etc, etc.
And just like Rob Reiner, when my wife's parents are murdered in their home, without knowing anything else about the situation, everyone who's ever known them will know exactly who to point to, it was so obvious to everyone except them.
You've got that right on both counts.
To me it reads like a trademark rambling attempt to ""weave"".
"Before they died they thought I was bad, which obviously means they're crazy and wrong. And they're not really that famous anyway. Death is sad, but at the end of the day I'm the best. Sad. Best. RIP. "
It's less a deft weave and more like two postcards that have been jammed into a shredder at the same time.
Edit: On second thoughts I think it's simpler than that. There was a news headline that wasn't about Trump, and he wanted to divert the attention away from the news and on to himself. Mission accomplished.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link