This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I mean the big one that sticks out to me for Obama crossing lines is when he put out a hit list that included American citizens, and then actually killed said American citizen in a targeted strike (also killing said American citizen's teenage American citizen son). He was a terrorist shitbag who deserved to die, mind you, but the right way to do it would have been in a plausibly deniable way through one of our allies like the Brits, not straight up saying "We're going to assasinate this American citizen" and then actually following through.
Anwar al-Awlaki is the American citizen terrorist shitbag in question, by the way:
https://www.motherjones.com/criminal-justice/2010/08/aclu-anwar-al-awlaki/
The only significant leftwing criticism of this came from the ACLU, I don't recall any democrats in congress voicing opposition. Republicans were also generally supportive as well, for shitbag Muslim terrorist reasons.
This is one of those things that is a legal red line, but is obviously such a sensible thing to do (unlike, say, having Yemeni-American citizens who run off and become jihadists) that nobody really cared except leftists. There was quite a bit of leftist criticism at the time, I recall, although the antiwar left was already marginalized and so didn't make it into prestige institutions. Now that "line" mostly matters insofar as it points out liberal hypocrisy when they claim Trump crossing much lesser ones is completely unprecedented.
GWOT probably did more to completely normalize line-crossing as a matter of government procedure than anything else - but that's how it works, if it's a matter of government procedure, then by definition it isn't crossing a line.
The thing is, the legal line isn't where people think it is.
This goes into war powers, specifically the Congressional authorization of use of force against Al Qaeda, wherever it was, which included Yemen via AQAP, which is what those Yemeni-American Jihadists were a part of. Once the United States is in a legal state of armed conflict (colloquially 'war'), individuals start falling under various laws of wars and relevant precedents. The precedents applicable to American citizen joining, say, Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, are the precedents established during WW2 with American citizens found serving in the Axis militaries. In Re Territo from WW2 is a relevant case.
The very short version of that is that the legal red line is 'Americans who take up arms against the United States on behalf of parties in conflict with the United States are considered belligerents of that other party, and do not get special exemptions from the normal rules governing conflict.' It is not a violation of constitutional rights to kill a belligerent fighting against the United States, even if that belligerent is an American citizen, any more than taking that belligerent prisoner and keeping them as a POW without an arrest.
The legal issue with hitting a Yemeni-American citizen in a drone strike in a conflict isn't the American citizenship, but the drone strike itself. The American citizenship is immaterial to whether the target is a belligerent- the issue is if you can take the drone strike against a belligerent in the first place.
Now, this doesn't mean that it was a good idea. I myself think it wasn't. But the issue is the awful, not the lawful.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link