site banner

Small-Scale Question Sunday for December 21, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a debate between people who think there's a 30% correlation and people who think there's an 80% correlation.

I don't think that situation around this could be properly called "debate", when "good link" you posted uses "pseudoscientific" to label his opponent. Also, many people on the blank slatist side would say "this 30% is on a population level and confounded by population stratification, true causal is about 8-15%".

Median argument on public policy assumes there's 0% correlation. Even if a person agrees on paper that h2 is 30%, they are usually fiercely opposed towards updating public policy to aknowledge these 30%, so why do you think "genetics denier" is inappropriate?