This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
We are here now: taking Blue's pawns off the board, in a fashion meant to ensure that, when Blue again calls for more pawns, less of them show up (Blue media is doing a great job of over-reporting the dangers here). Would you prefer Red go after Blue directly?
Hence the physical removals, hence the [so far, only claimed] attempts to stabilize the nations from which they come.
This is robotically applying the harsh punishment to the people who trafficked those humans (the greater evil in this case, at least from Red's perspective)- or at least, what Blue perceives as a harsh punishment despite it being objectively pretty lenient. Blue has to see on the news more of their pets being deleted, and whining about being afraid they'll be removed, every single day. They have to listen to their peers cry that It's So Over and marinate in their own hysterics about the end of Our Democracy. Some of them get so angry about this that they try to run over cops.
As for "but it's a human rights disaster", Blue has no leg to stand on here- they could have compromised for an amnesty properly but refused to, so clearly they don't care about their pets' rights beyond their usefulness as pets.
Ironically, that's the best way to criticize this event- using a human shield to cover hurting the outgroup, then striking back under "self-defense" when the outgroup decides they care as much about the life of the human shield as the ingroup did.
More options
Context Copy link