This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
:shrug: You advanced a definition of "attack." Here is what you said:
So now you are saying that under your definition of "attack," Dutch people are attacking Israel; Palestinian Arabs are attacking Israel; but Jordanians are NOT attacking Israel?
Please answer the question. What exactly is "Palestinian Land"? If you want to link to a map that's fine.
(1) What exactly is "Palestinian Land," i.e. where is it? What cities and regions are included in "Palestinian Land"? Does it include Gaza? Does it include Hebron? Does it include Jerusalem? Tel Aviv? Ramallah?
(2) How did that land come to be "Palestinian Land" -- are you saying that this is the result of some decision by the UN? If so, please link and quote.
(3) What is the evidence that Israel is trying to "steal" Palestinian Land?
(4) Are Hebron, Gaza City, and the Eastern part of Jerusalem part of "Palestinian Land"? If so, did they become "Palestinian Land" before or after the ethnic cleansing of the Jews who lived there in the 1920s through 1940s?
Look, you've made a very serious accusation against Israel and I expect you to define that accusation and provide evidence for it.
Please answer my question first. You are the one claiming that Israel is trying to "steal" something which you referred to as "Palestinian Land" Please define your terms and provide evidence for your claim.
What exactly was my argument? On this point, the first step is to get you to define your terms. You have used the phrase "Palestinian Land" and accused Israel of attempting to "steal" it. It is completely reasonable for me to request you to define your terms.
What I said before was imprecise. Here is what I said:
When I posted this, I was envisioning that all of the behavior of the people of Gaza toward Israel would be like Switzerland's behavior towards France, including preparation for future attacks. I concede that a mere ceasefire accompanied by preparation for future attacks would not immediately result in an end to the blockade.
In that case, you should ask me politely just as I have asked you politely.
In that regard, please answer my questions. In addition to the questions above:
Are you saying that Israel violated the Oslo accords? If so, could you please quote the exact clause which was violated and explain exactly what was done in violation?
You link to a UK report. Please quote the part of the report you believe is relevant to your claims.
The paper you link to provides (1) Hamas' understanding of the agreement; and (2) Israel's understanding of the agreement, and you conclude that Israel must be lying. Do I understand you correctly?
An infinite amount of time has NOT elapsed since the last attack by Jordan. Agreed?
More options
Context Copy link