This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Except one small detail - the Left does not believe in having rules. At least not in any rules they don't like, and that includes any rules that allow for any enforcement of the immigration laws, especially - any enforcement against the people already on US territory. They believe no enforcement should be happening at all, thus listening to any noises from their side about how exactly this enforcement should be happening is pointless - it is nothing but a tactics to lead to the ultimate goal, no enforcement happening at all, ever.
You don't need to pardon if you don't convict. Michael Byrd had not been convicted. And, of course, for "pardoning left and right" one first needs to "prosecute left and right" (otherwise there's nobody to pardon) and I don't remember any examples of mass political prosecutions by the right (giving the left the chance for mass pardons) anytime in 21st century. With all the hate directed at the last two Presidents from the Left, I do not remember any effort to frame them for treason, prosecute them criminally and all the security apparatus working against them while they are being nominally in power. Democrats are the party of lawyers, and the are much more successful in lawfare than Republicans had ever been. The only two weapons on Republican side are pardons and SCOTUS (the latter is more a matter of luck, and so far Republicans have been lucky).
And, of course, Biden's blanket pardons should put the topic of "pardoning people left and right" to rest for good.
As for immunity, all the law enforcement has immunity, so the claim only one side claims it is transparently false. If you want to get rid of qualified immunity, I am all for it, but somehow the left only remembers such a thing exists when it's convenient to use it to claim Republicans are fascists, but completely forget about it the moment it becomes inconvenient for them. Again, one can't help but conclude there's nothing but angling for power here.
And I read an article that aliens built Egyptian pyramids and stole Atlantis. There are a lot of articles on the internet, so what?
Maybe, but this slide does not look like you're implying it looks. The left has slid to the bottom and gleefully and openly celebrates any political murder for years now. Charlie Kirk is just one of many examples, and we see many people on the left openly agitating for the same treatment for other political enemies. So if the right is "starting" to slide into it - which is doubtful, I haven't seen any celebration and cheering - as opposed to somber justification, which is not the same thing - on the right - the "starting" here would be only on one side, the other side is deep down the slide already. There is no implied symmetry here - the right says "if you attack a cop with a deadly weapon, the cop has the right to kill you", the left says "if you say words we do not like or think thoughts we do not like, anybody of use has the right and the duty to kill you". Very different thing.
More options
Context Copy link