This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
All too true. Alas, this is pretty much SOP since a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1975 set that specific standard. The system, such as it is, is working as intended. I work with folks that are responsible for doing the psychiatric screening end of this that get dispatched to the hospitals to determine whether or not these sorts of individuals are in such imminent danger to themselves or others or alternately cannot care for themselves that they need to be temporarily detained against their own will. It pretty much sucks for all liable parties, which is to say the hospitals, LEOs, and the screeners. The LEOs must regularly attend training on how to assess potential mental health issues with these sorts of folks and they could conceivably be put under the microscope for the decisions they make in these sorts of cases, so they're going to err on the side of taking folks to the hospital, where high-priced medical staff often need to basically wait for a drunk/drugged up patient to sober up, deal with the frequent fliers that are off their meds or worse still, decompensating but have to stay there until a bed opens up in a longer term care unit, or convince the depressed individual to just commit to a fucking safety plan already and Get Out of Dodge while they still can because they really don't want to have all of their things away and have to live in a padded room for a few days until they're judged safe from harming themselves, now do they? If a patient makes it to one of our people then we have to go through reams of paperwork to document the encounter with the client as well as the entire timeline from when the client hits to the hospital to when we leave, including when we first get the call, when we arrive at the hospital, what the disposition of the case was, whether or not the client was temporarily detained and if so, where were they sent, when was the ruling made, who ended up transporting the client, when did they arrive to collect the client, other various and sundry questions all revolving how long things took because detainment orders expire, and so if things go awry the bureaucracy can cover its ass and point the finger at the right party, which starts with our folks if they don't document everything to a T to begin with.
Somewhere, Moloch is smiling.
More options
Context Copy link