Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 353
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I've always raised an eyebrow at this advice. Speaking for myself, I've never felt that photography distracted me from being "in the moment." If I'm visiting a nice place, I'm going to whip out my phone, take as many photos as I please, and then use my Mk. 1 human eyeballs. I don't perceive events entirely through a viewfinder.
And I notice that my memory of events is significantly enhanced by photos. I have forgotten a ton of things until I've seen a picture that either brought back memories or let me reconstruct them.
You would have to have a very pathological attachment to a camera for taking photos at the frequency of a normal 21st century human to be detrimental.
I go one better and try to take a DLSR and tripod with me if it's feasible, and even if I'm stuck using my phone I try to at least take a good picture and not just snap away. With the DSLR, especially, I find that it actually enhances the experience because when you're trying to take a good photo, i.e. something that you might want to get a print of and frame for the wall of your office or living room, you spend a lot more time looking than you otherwise might. If you're at an overlook a small building you wouldn't have otherwise noticed may either become a distraction that needs to be kept out of the shot or the focal point of the whole composition, depending on the situation. Lines, topography, geometric shapes, framing, color, points of interest, etc. And then I get to go into Photoshop and coax the image that I saw out of the raw data dump, and try to capture its emotional impact.
The end result of this process is that I might get 2 or 3 images that are frame-worthy, if I'm lucky, as well a as a few that just don't work at all. The upshot is that a standard vacation album still ends up being a lot better than the one from the guy with the phone who just snaps everything he sees without thought, allows the JPEG algorithm in the phone to make all the processing decisions, and ends up with a whole bunch of pictures that all look the same.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link