Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 353
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Funny, I have the exact opposite outlook. Not that I'm a serious photographer (have taken my phone for granted and now rarely carry a camera - too heavy and awkward), but when I was taking lots of pictures, I found it immensely beneficial to step out of the flow of the moment, frame a good shot, and take a picture of the scene. The flow of life goes on and is forgotten; the act of stepping out - with the intention to frame a good photo - makes a moment tangible as something which cannot be taken for granted and is thus inscribed in memory. I suspect the biggest part of that is doing it with intention and as part of a practice, since I can get a somewhat similar effect these days by taking a deep breath and opening awareness in the manner of a meditation.
Agree entirely on the social media aspect, of course, would be 100% nodding with a post titled "Against Instagram Stories". I miss Facebook photo albums, a much more human version of photographic memory.
Wonder also if this is one of those memory and visualization differences people have. I have an extremely strong visual memory, particularly for places I found visually compelling. Can close my eyes and take a 3D walk through many of them, and when I look at old photos I can expand them into all sorts of associated memories. I see a photo on the Danube bridge of Regensburg and I can see myself in the backstreets on the cobblestones, my bauernschmaus by the cathedral, trudging back to the hostel at night, etc.. I don't think all those other memories would be as strong without the photo to hang them all on, it would just be somewhere I went and I might remember that the river was beautiful.
It's so interesting that other people seem to have a very different perspective on this than me. Maybe the key difference is the first vs. third person photos? I can definitely say what you're saying about the photo helping with trigging memories of the landscape/city and I suspect this might be true for me as well. The problem for me I think principally is third-person photos (i.e. photos that I am in). These just absolutely wreck my memories.
That makes a ton of sense to me. You didn't go through the memory-fixing process of creating the shot.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link