site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The podcast Sold a Story claims that “whole language” and “balanced literacy” became mainstream curricula for reading instruction in American schools despite the fact that they are almost certainly trash.

I'm not sure that "despite" belongs there for any sort of widespread policy, government or otherwise. It just seems to me that "is this thing almost certainly trash?" simply isn't a thought that crosses anyone's minds when implementing this kind of stuff, and certainly not when they're following it. It's more, "Can it convincingly appear to people, especially people I consider important, to be effective?"

But to get away from the snarky cynical aside, I must admit that I find myself feeling little vindicated at learning of this. I'm a Korean immigrant to the USA, and I had immense difficulty learning how to read English when I first moved here, starting from no English knowledge at 1st grade. There was one lesson that was a huge breakthrough for me, which was when my father sat me down one day and wrote out for me each of the 26 letters and then the Korean (Hangul) next to each that came closest to the pronunciation of that particular letter. (E.g. "아" for "a"). From then on, I was able to mentally map English letters to Hangul and sound them out that way, eventually internalizing the English directly and getting to the point where my English reading was better than my Korean.

This had its issues, since English doesn't neatly map letters to sounds like in Hangul. And not just exceptions, but just standard usage - e.g. is the letter "a" more commonly pronounced like in "dab" or like in "haha" or like in "anus?" I don't know. Whereas "아" is always - almost definitionally - pronounced like the "a" in "haha." But it was, in my case, still evidently good enough to use as a base to make me reach the point where my reading skills were indistinguishable from that of a native.

I always assumed that my experience was atypical. Now I'm wondering how many students learning English are suffering like I did, but without having access to that sort of breakthrough lesson where they're taught explicitly the phonemes of each letter.