site banner
PaperclipPerfector  8d ago (text post)   25907 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Since you're so concerned about the poor men who are unfairly punished for their natural sexual attraction towards girls, here's a sad and sorry case of another normal man being convicted of a crime that is no crime.

The man who sexually assaulted a 16-year old girl on a flight to Boston is well known as a ‘Celtic healer’ who claims he sees fairies on his farmland.

This week, Ennis Circuit Court heard that Patrick Noone (58) had pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual assault of the girl on board an Aer Lingus flight bound for Boston on November 15, 2023.

Cabin crew informed the plane’s captain that a male passenger had allegedly inappropriately touched a teenager who was sitting beside him. The captain turned the plane around and returned to Shannon Airport.

Noone, of Curragh, Kilconnell, Ballinasloe, Co Galway, admitted he had rubbed and grabbed the teenager’s buttocks on board the flight within the jurisdiction of the Irish State.

He also pleaded guilty to kissing the girl’s arm and rubbing her thigh.

...It is understood that Noone was travelling alone on the flight to Boston when he assaulted the 16-year-old girl in 2023.

The prosecution previously told the court one of four people due to ­testify via video-link was the complainant, who is now 18 and studying in the US.

Ms Comerford said that the complainant’s grandmother was a witness in the book of evidence, she is an elderly lady and a resident of the US, as are two other females who were on the flight.

...The detective said that, about an hour into the transatlantic flight, at about 3.30pm, a girl informed cabin crew she had been inappropriately touched by a man sitting beside her. The captain made the decision to return to Shannon, where statements were obtained from the complainant and witnesses.

How very wrong of our judgemental society to punish this man for acting on his natural attraction to the girl, who was even older than 15! Plus the hussy probably enticed and tempted him, and then tried to play the victim!

can you understand that this would have been illegal even if she were 76? this has nothing to do with the age of consent because she did not consent.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats