site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is worth noting that the author explicitly identifies himself as opposed to Christian culture:

I suppose you could say I’m very much an outsider to Christianity. I grew up with a bad attitude toward it, and for good reason. People like me were just regularly abused and oppressed by bigoted and cruel Christian teachings. And so this book represents a real change of course for me

He admits that his own group enjoys the hallmark feature of nationalistic narrative-maintenance and victimhood, yet has not written any criticism about this:

As a Jew, I grew up immersed in a narrative of persecution, flight, exile, vulnerability, and vigilance. […] I feel an immense pride in America’s pluralism and tolerance while remaining conscious—as a Jew and also as a homosexual—of my status as a minority and an outsider.

He admits to being aligned with a unique heritage, culture, ethical sense, and outlook:

I am Jewish by heritage and culture, atheist by belief […] I have Jewish ethics, Jewish sense of humor, Jewish outlook—pretty much everything Jewish

There is little reason to believe that he is arguing earnestly here. This is like if a Saudi American who talks about his identity as a Gulf Arab wrote an article criticizing Canada’s use of fossil fuels. He would never write an article condemning Israel for “its insistence that the country is not just a collection of individuals but a people, a mystically defined and ethnically pure group bound together by shared blood, culture, and destiny”. He would claim that that is Different, for Reasons.