site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 9, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there's being on American's shit list, and there's 'bombing the Strait of Hormuz and being treated as a rogue state by everyone'.

That's not what is happening. China is still getting about 50% of what they were getting, directly from Iran. Western aligned countries are not getting oil through the straits.

It's a more or less selective blockade. Just like the Houthis in the Red Sea, which again the US really struggled to partially reopen...

Assassination has never worked, not once in the entire history of warfare. Nobody fought a war and it was decided by an assassination. That's why we have large militaries instead of ninjas and spies and missiles that would be much cheaper. The Israelis don't seem to appreciate this, they tried assassinations against Hamas for a few years... doesn't work. Hamas is still there, just as before despite considerable effort to destroy them. For some reason they keep trying it and people keep thinking it will work, despite literally no empirical evidence whatsoever and great evidence to the contrary. If assassinations work, then you're really dealing with some kind of gang or a very low-tier organization, not a real country. To destroy Hamas the Israelis needed to invade and conquer Gaza, kill Hamas from the bottom up, not just rain down bombs here and there.

If Iran blew up Trump and Jared and Vance and Hegseth and another 20 four star generals, that wouldn't impair the US a jot. They have plenty more generals, plenty more politicians. It'd be quite embarrassing but the entire army, navy and air force is still there, the nuclear forces remain, the wealth creating industries are there, the energy is there, the population is there, the food is there. The US would not have a civil war because some officials got blown up. Americans would instead double down and lash out aggressively.

To really break America, you'd need to crush the entire US military including the nuclear forces, you have to massacre millions and millions of Americans, bomb out cities, induce famine, starve off energy... And all that can only really be done by a huge nuclear attack or a ground invasion. Same with Iran, albeit scaled down.